Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VBNK vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
VBNK vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $596M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $120M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $109M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $582M | $185M |
VBNK vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VersaBank (VBNK) | 100 | 383.2 | +283.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VBNK vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VBNK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 446.7% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 20.4%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.73 vs NBTB's 0.89
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs VBNK's 6.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs VBNK's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.6x), PEG 1.53 vs 6.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs VBNK's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs VBNK's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.8% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs VBNK's 0.7% |
VBNK vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VBNK vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VBNK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 7.2x VBNK's $120M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 23.7% (VBNK) to 19.5% (NBTB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $120M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 52% valuation discount to VBNK's 28.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs VBNK's 15.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $596M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $249M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.29x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.57x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 15.05x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.63x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.77x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for VBNK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VBNK's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs VBNK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$473M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $582M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.25x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VBNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VBNK five years ago would be worth $15,293 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, VBNK leads with a +69.8% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VBNK at 41.9% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.7% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.4% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +446.7% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.9% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
VBNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VBNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.02 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VBNK as "Buy" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -30.3% for VBNK (target: $13). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs VBNK's 0.40%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.4% |
VBNK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NBTB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
VBNK vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VBNK or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for VersaBank (VBNK). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VersaBank (VBNK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VBNK or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus VersaBank at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus VersaBank's 6. 16x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VBNK or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, VersaBank (VBNK) delivered a total return of +52.
9%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VBNK returned +446. 7% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VBNK or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VersaBank (VBNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 22% more volatile than VBNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 20% for VersaBank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VBNK or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 7. 7% for VersaBank (VBNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for VersaBank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VBNK or NBTB?
VersaBank (VBNK) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
7% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VBNK leads at 34. 5% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VBNK leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VBNK or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus VersaBank's 6. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for VersaBank — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VBNK or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 4% for VersaBank (VBNK).
09Is VBNK or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, VBNK: +446. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VBNK and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VBNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. NBTB pays a dividend while VBNK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.