Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $3.25B | $1.75B | $2.01B | $45.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $542M | $1.46B | $880M | $4.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $92M | $-603M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 71.4% | 31.9% | 38.0% | 62.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 11.6% | -2.0% | 31.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 14.2x | 25.9x | 39.5x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $762M | $913M | $1.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $363M | $68M | $129M | $180M |
VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veracyte, Inc. (VCYT) | 100 | 163.4 | +63.4% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 164.7 | +64.7% |
| Neogen Corporation (NEOG) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 185.2 | +85.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VCYT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs IDXX's 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 8.15x
- Beta 1.52, current ratio 8.15x
PAHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- PEG 1.90 vs IDXX's 2.76
- 27.4% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2%
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 39.5x), PEG 1.90 vs 2.76
NEOG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IDXX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.35
- 24.6% margin vs NEOG's -68.5%
- Beta 1.35 vs NEOG's 1.83
- 32.6% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 42.5% vs 0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 39.5x), PEG 1.90 vs 2.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs NEOG's -68.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs NEOG's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.1% vs IDXX's +17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 42.5% vs 0.2% |
VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAHC leads in 2 of 6 categories
VCYT leads 1 • IDXX leads 1 • NEOG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VCYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDXX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 8.2x VCYT's $542M. IDXX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEOG's -68.5%. On growth, VCYT holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $542M | $1.5B | $880M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $82M | $220M | $100M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | $92M | -$603M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $155M | $47M | $17M | $845M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.4% | +31.9% | +38.0% | +62.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +11.6% | -2.0% | +31.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +6.3% | -68.5% | +24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +3.2% | +2.0% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.5% | +20.9% | -2.8% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +7.4% | +96.5% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PAHC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.3x trailing earnings, PAHC trades at a 27% valuation discount to VCYT's 49.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDXX offers better value at 3.06x vs PAHC's 4.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $45.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $46.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.71x | 36.27x | -1.84x | 43.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.57x | 14.23x | 25.87x | 39.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.85x | — | 3.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.65x | 15.65x | 20.70x | 31.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.29x | 1.35x | 2.25x | 10.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 6.15x | 0.97x | 28.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.68x | 41.82x | — | 43.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NEOG. VCYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAHC's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCYT scores 8/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +30.8% | -28.6% | +70.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +6.7% | -17.9% | +32.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +9.8% | +0.2% | +42.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +12.0% | +0.2% | +61.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 2.67x | 0.44x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$323M | $694M | $784M | $897M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $363M | $68M | $129M | $180M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $762M | $913M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.64x | -8.33x | 35.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAHC five years ago would be worth $16,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,940 for NEOG. Over the past 12 months, PAHC leads with a +125.1% total return vs IDXX's +17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAHC at 45.9% vs NEOG's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | +16.0% | +32.1% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +125.1% | +56.0% | +17.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.1% | +210.4% | -46.1% | +17.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.1% | +66.0% | -80.6% | +5.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +638.4% | +128.6% | -49.8% | +556.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.7% | +45.9% | -18.6% | +5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEOG and IDXX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDXX is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEOG's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEOG currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs PAHC's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.38x | 1.83x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.71 | $60.08 | $11.43 | $769.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.61 | $19.00 | $4.53 | $471.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +71.8% | +80.9% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.3 | 60.3 | 46.2 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 887K | 302K | 2.5M | 533K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCYT as "Buy", PAHC as "Buy", NEOG as "Hold", IDXX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.1% upside for IDXX (target: $773) vs 9.2% for VCYT (target: $45). PAHC is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.50 | $49.00 | $11.00 | $773.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 13 | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
PAHC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). VCYT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
VCYT vs PAHC vs NEOG vs IDXX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the stronger pick with 27.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Veracyte, Inc. (VCYT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX?
On trailing P/E, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the cheapest at 36.
3x versus Veracyte, Inc. at 49. 7x. On forward P/E, Phibro Animal Health Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Phibro Animal Health Corporation wins at 1. 90x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX?
Over the past 5 years, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) delivered a total return of +66.
0%, compared to -80. 6% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCYT returned +638. 4% versus NEOG's -49. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Neogen Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning NEOG is approximately 36% more volatile than IDXX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veracyte, Inc. (VCYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Phibro Animal Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is pulling ahead at 27.
4% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VCYT leads at 20. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX?
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -122. 1% for Neogen Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDXX leads at 31. 6% versus 1. 1% for NEOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VCYT leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 90x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDXX: 35. 1% to $773. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX?
In this comparison, PAHC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. VCYT, NEOG, IDXX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VCYT or PAHC or NEOG or IDXX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +128. 6% 10Y return). Neogen Corporation (NEOG) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAHC: +128. 6%, NEOG: -49. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VCYT and PAHC and NEOG and IDXX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PAHC pays a dividend while VCYT, NEOG, IDXX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.