Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VERO
Venus Concept Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$499K
5Y Perf.-92.4%
LASE
Laser Photonics Corporation

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-82.1%
NPKI
NPK International Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+73.3%
INMD
InMode Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$882M
5Y Perf.-30.0%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-76.3%

VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VERO logoVERO
LASE logoLASE
NPKI logoNPKI
INMD logoINMD
AEYE logoAEYE
IndustryMedical - DevicesIndustrial - MachineryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesMedical - DevicesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$499K$16M$1.30B$882M$100M
Revenue (TTM)$59M$7M$287M$375M$40M
Net Income (TTM)$-55M$-8M$36M$87M$-3M
Gross Margin64.4%31.1%35.2%77.8%78.3%
Operating Margin-59.0%-126.5%11.4%21.3%-7.9%
Forward P/E29.3x9.6x
Total Debt$43M$5M$37M$13M$721K
Cash & Equiv.$4M$534K$5M$303M$5M

VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VERO
LASE
NPKI
INMD
AEYE
StockNov 24Apr 26Return
Venus Concept Inc. (VERO)1007.6-92.4%
Laser Photonics Cor… (LASE)10017.9-82.1%
NPK International I… (NPKI)100173.3+73.3%
InMode Ltd. (INMD)10070.0-30.0%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10023.7-76.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INMD leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NPK International Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VERO
Venus Concept Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

VERO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
LASE
Laser Photonics Corporation
The Income Pick

LASE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.68
Best for: income & stability
NPKI
NPK International Inc.
The Growth Play

NPKI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
  • 27.4% revenue growth vs VERO's -15.1%
  • +94.9% vs VERO's -88.5%
Best for: growth exposure
INMD
InMode Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 105.0% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AEYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNPKI logoNPKI27.4% revenue growth vs VERO's -15.1%
ValueINMD logoINMDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINMD logoINMD23.3% margin vs LASE's -105.4%
Stability / SafetyINMD logoINMDBeta 1.04 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NPKI logoNPKI+94.9% vs VERO's -88.5%
Efficiency (ROA)INMD logoINMD11.8% ROA vs VERO's -88.6%, ROIC 13.5% vs -39.8%

VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VEROVenus Concept Inc.
FY 2024
System
58.6%$38M
Leases
20.5%$13M
Product
16.1%$10M
Service
4.7%$3M
LASELaser Photonics Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

NPKINPK International Inc.
FY 2025
Rental and Service
66.3%$184M
Product
33.7%$93M
INMDInMode Ltd.
FY 2025
Capital Equipment
100.0%$289M
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M

VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINMDLAGGINGAEYE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

INMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $375M annually — 52.5x LASE's $7M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LASE's -105.4%. On growth, LASE holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVERO logoVEROVenus Concept Inc.LASE logoLASELaser Photonics C…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$59M$7M$287M$375M$40M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$8M$53M$81M-$504,000
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$55M-$8M$36M$87M-$3M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$21M-$4M$32M$91M$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.4%+31.1%+35.2%+77.8%+78.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-59.0%-126.5%+11.4%+21.3%-7.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-92.8%-105.4%+12.4%+23.3%-7.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-35.2%-58.7%+11.1%+24.2%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.2%+28.3%+15.9%+5.3%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.5%-7.4%0.0%-30.8%+29.0%
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.7x trailing earnings, INMD trades at a 74% valuation discount to NPKI's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NPKI's 18.5x.

MetricVERO logoVEROVenus Concept Inc.LASE logoLASELaser Photonics C…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$498,989$16M$1.3B$882M$100M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$39M$21M$1.3B$593M$96M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-3.29x36.75x9.73x-32.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.34x9.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.49x6.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x4.70x4.71x2.38x2.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x0.90x3.77x1.33x20.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.58x10.46x
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-17 for VERO. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VERO's 15.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPKI scores 7/9 vs LASE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVERO logoVEROVenus Concept Inc.LASE logoLASELaser Photonics C…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-17.4%-183.5%+10.3%+13.3%-47.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-88.6%-43.1%+8.5%+11.8%-9.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.8%-42.1%+9.9%+13.5%-42.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-54.2%-45.9%+12.7%+12.1%-17.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–951734
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage15.16x0.49x0.10x0.02x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$39M$4M$31M-$289M-$5M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$533,871$5M$303M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$43M$5M$37M$13M$721,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.69x-6.60x77.08x-2.79x
INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NPKI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NPKI five years ago would be worth $19,150 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9 for VERO. Over the past 12 months, NPKI leads with a +94.9% total return vs VERO's -88.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPKI at 24.2% vs VERO's -79.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVERO logoVEROVenus Concept Inc.LASE logoLASELaser Photonics C…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-82.3%-63.8%+27.6%-5.9%-18.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-88.5%-74.1%+94.9%-2.1%-27.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-76.6%+91.5%-60.2%+20.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-72.0%+91.5%-63.9%-60.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-72.0%+91.5%+105.0%+102.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-79.4%-38.4%+24.2%-26.4%+6.4%
NPKI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NPKI and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

INMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPKI currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs VERO's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVERO logoVEROVenus Concept Inc.LASE logoLASELaser Photonics C…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.43x1.68x1.47x1.04x2.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.93$6.77$16.50$16.74$16.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.26$0.38$7.63$12.72$5.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.1%+10.7%+93.5%+83.2%+49.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.938.556.639.861.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K1.9M795K804K194K
Evenly matched — NPKI and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LASE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NPKI as "Buy", INMD as "Buy".

MetricVERO logoVEROVenus Concept Inc.LASE logoLASELaser Photonics C…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises201
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.7%+14.5%0.0%
LASE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

INMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NPKI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallInMode Ltd. (INMD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VERO vs LASE vs NPKI vs INMD vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NPK International Inc. (NPKI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE?

On trailing P/E, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus NPK International Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, InMode Ltd. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE?

Over the past 5 years, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) delivered a total return of +91. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INMD returned +105. 0% versus VERO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 120% more volatile than INMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 15% for Venus Concept Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -15. 1% for Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NPK International Inc. grew EPS 124. 0% year-over-year, compared to -869. 0% for Venus Concept Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE?

InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -73. 8% for Laser Photonics Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -189. 3% for LASE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 29. 3x for NPK International Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is VERO or LASE or NPKI or INMD or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +105. 0% 10Y return). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INMD: +105. 0%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VERO and LASE and NPKI and INMD and AEYE?

These companies operate in different sectors (VERO (Healthcare) and LASE (Industrials) and NPKI (Energy) and INMD (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VERO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LASE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VERO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LASE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NPKI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INMD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VERO and LASE and NPKI and INMD and AEYE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VERO: -8.2% · LASE: 28.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.