Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $319M | $195M | $122M | $660M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $216M | $361M | $294M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $41M | $-327M | $-2.95B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 62.7% | 22.8% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 13.3% | -24.1% | -266.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 164.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $39M | $104M | $348M | $451M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $184M | $114M | $304M |
VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Village Farms Inter… (VFF) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| Canopy Growth Corpo… (CGC) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) | 100 | 56.4 | -43.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VFF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.69
- 144.8% 10Y total return vs TLRY's -74.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 12.5%, current ratio 2.64x
- Better valuation composite
ACB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 102.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.8%
- Beta 1.81, current ratio 4.31x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs VFF's -35.8%
CGC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TLRY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +12.1% vs ACB's -25.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs VFF's -35.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs TLRY's -252.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs TLRY's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.1% vs ACB's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs TLRY's -100.6%, ROIC 7.4% vs -66.2% |
VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VFF leads in 4 of 6 categories
TLRY leads 1 • ACB leads 0 • CGC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VFF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TLRY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 5.4x VFF's $216M. VFF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLRY's -2.5%. On growth, CGC holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $216M | $361M | $294M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $44M | $71M | -$32M | -$3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $41M | -$327M | -$2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$31M | -$86M | -$94M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +62.7% | +22.8% | +28.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +13.3% | -24.1% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +11.2% | -111.0% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | -8.7% | -29.3% | -8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.2% | +6.8% | +20.9% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.3% | -94.5% | +83.8% | +70.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TLRY leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, VFF trades at a 94% valuation discount to ACB's 164.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VFF's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACB's 6.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $319M | $195M | $122M | $660M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $277M | $136M | $293M | $806M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.22x | 164.21x | -0.28x | -0.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.23x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.40x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.31x | 6.73x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.48x | 0.77x | 0.62x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.43x | 0.34x | 0.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VFF leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VFF delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-137 for TLRY. VFF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CGC's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VFF scores 7/9 vs TLRY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +7.2% | -43.1% | -136.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +5.2% | -29.5% | -100.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +0.7% | -10.2% | -66.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +0.7% | -12.4% | -78.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.17x | 0.72x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | -$80M | $235M | $147M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $184M | $114M | $304M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $104M | $348M | $451M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.13x | 6.27x | -7.79x | -89.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VFF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TLRY five years ago would be worth $3,498 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for CGC. Over the past 12 months, TLRY leads with a +1209.3% total return vs ACB's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VFF at 55.4% vs CGC's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.2% | -21.0% | -5.0% | -41.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +323.6% | -25.3% | -12.4% | +1209.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.5% | -47.2% | -91.4% | +103.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.2% | -96.1% | -99.6% | -65.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.8% | -92.0% | -94.3% | -74.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.4% | -19.2% | -55.9% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
VFF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VFF is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TLRY's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VFF currently trades 55.3% from its 52-week high vs TLRY's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 1.80x | 1.95x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.99 | $6.67 | $2.38 | $15.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $3.07 | $0.84 | $0.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.3% | +51.4% | +47.5% | +36.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 52.2 | 52.9 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 979K | 10.4M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VFF as "Buy", ACB as "Hold", CGC as "Hold", TLRY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1180.5% upside for CGC (target: $14) vs 72.6% for ACB (target: $6).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.15 | $5.92 | $14.47 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 14 | 26 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VFF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TLRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
VFF vs ACB vs CGC vs TLRY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurora Cannabis Inc.
(ACB) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 8% for Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF). Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY?
On trailing P/E, Village Farms International, Inc.
(VFF) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Aurora Cannabis Inc. at 164. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY?
Over the past 5 years, Tilray Brands, Inc.
(TLRY) delivered a total return of -65. 0%, compared to -99. 6% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VFF returned +128. 0% versus CGC's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Village Farms International, Inc.
(VFF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 62β versus Tilray Brands, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning TLRY is approximately 25% more volatile than VFF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 72% for Canopy Growth Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurora Cannabis Inc.
(ACB) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -35. 8% for Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Village Farms International, Inc. grew EPS 184. 4% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACB leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY?
Village Farms International, Inc.
(VFF) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 0% net margin versus -266. 3% for Tilray Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VFF leads at 12. 7% versus -277. 9% for TLRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACB leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGC: 1180.
5% to $14. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VFF or ACB or CGC or TLRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Village Farms International, Inc.
(VFF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+128. 0% 10Y return). Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VFF: +128. 0%, TLRY: -75. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VFF and ACB and CGC and TLRY?
These companies operate in different sectors (VFF (Consumer Defensive) and ACB (Healthcare) and CGC (Healthcare) and TLRY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VFF is a small-cap deep-value stock; ACB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TLRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.