Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) vs NIO Inc. (NIO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VFS | 57.9% revenue growth vs NIO's 18.2% |
| Quality / Margins | NIO | -35.0% net margin vs VFS's -137.0% |
| Stability / Safety | VFS | Beta 0.79 vs NIO's 0.91 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NIO | +5.2% vs VFS's -9.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NIO | -24.3% ROA vs VFS's -50.4%, ROIC -55.2% vs -78.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
VinFast is a Vietnamese electric vehicle manufacturer that designs and produces EVs, e-scooters, and e-buses primarily for the Vietnamese market with expansion into North America. It generates revenue through vehicle sales—with cars being the dominant segment—alongside battery leasing and charging services for its products. The company benefits from being part of Vietnam's largest conglomerate, Vingroup, which provides capital and local market advantages.
NIO is a Chinese premium electric vehicle manufacturer that designs, develops, and sells smart electric cars along with a comprehensive ecosystem of charging and service solutions. The company generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales—including SUVs and sedans—and secondarily from its innovative battery-as-a-service (BaaS) subscription model and energy solutions like its unique battery swap stations. NIO's key competitive advantage lies in its premium brand positioning, integrated user ecosystem—featuring its exclusive NIO Houses and mobile app community—and its pioneering battery swap technology that addresses range anxiety through rapid battery replacement.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NIO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). VFS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
VFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $67.43T annually — 971.3x NIO's $69.4B. NIO is the more profitable business, keeping -35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VFS's -137.0%. On growth, VFS holds the edge at +46.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $67.43T | $69.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$55.31T | -$23.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$92.40T | -$24.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58.50T | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -53.0% | +10.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -98.1% | -32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -137.0% | -35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | -25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.1% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.1% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.6B | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $12.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | -3.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.52x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.4% | -24.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -78.9% | -55.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -41.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $143.09T | $14.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.31T | $19.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $146.40T | $33.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.52x | -25.29x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in VFS five years ago would be worth $3,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $979 for NIO. Over the past 12 months, NIO leads with a +5.2% total return vs VFS's -9.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NIO at -19.7% vs VFS's -32.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | -5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.9% | +5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | -90.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | -26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.2% | -19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
VFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NIO's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VFS currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs NIO's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.82 | $8.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.56 | $3.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 252K | 38.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VFS as "Buy" and NIO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.4% upside for VFS (target: $7) vs 37.6% for NIO (target: $7).
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $6.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 23 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | 100 | 31.58 | -68.4% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | 100 | 41.09 | -58.9% |
VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) returned -69% over 5 years vs NIO Inc. (NIO)'s -90%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | $13.7T | $44.0T | +221.5% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | $0.00 | $65.7B | — |
NIO Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $65.7B (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | -138.4% | -175.5% | -26.8% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | -195.1% | -34.5% | +82.3% |
NIO Inc.'s net margin went from -195% (2018) to -34% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | -8,160.27 | -33,042 | -304.9% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | -0.5 | -11.03 | -2106.0% |
NIO Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.50 (2016) to $-11.03 (2024).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
VinFast Auto Ltd. generated $-47.2T FCF in 2024 (-35% vs 2021). NIO Inc. generated $-17B FCF in 2024 (-704% vs 2021).
VFS vs NIO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VFS or NIO a better buy right now?
Analysts rate VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VFS or NIO?
Over the past 5 years, VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) delivered a total return of -68.8%, compared to -90.2% for NIO Inc. (NIO). A $10,000 investment in VFS five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NIO returned -26.2% versus VFS's -68.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VFS or NIO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.79β versus NIO Inc.'s 0.91β — meaning NIO is approximately 15% more volatile than VFS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — VFS or NIO?
NIO Inc. (NIO) is the more profitable company, earning -34.5% net margin versus -175.5% for VinFast Auto Ltd. — meaning it keeps -34.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NIO leads at -33.3% versus -125.9% for VFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIO leads at 9.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — VFS or NIO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is VFS or NIO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.79)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VFS: -68.8%, NIO: -26.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between VFS and NIO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.