Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Other Precious Metals
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold | Gold | Other Precious Metals | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $326M | $231M | $273M | $1.39B | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $93M | $0.00 | $162M | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-6M | $-20M | $74M | $594M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.9% | — | 32.9% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.1% | — | 22.2% | 40.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.6x | — | 22.2x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $91M | $34K | $926K | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $25M | $8M | $51M | $2M |
VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ) | 100 | 197.4 | +97.4% |
| Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
| McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) | 100 | 159.0 | +59.0% |
| Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VGZ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 220.9% 10Y total return vs GPOR's 145.1%
GORO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.0%, EPS growth 92.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.5%
- 44.0% revenue growth vs VGZ's -181.3%
USAU is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 10.11x
MUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
- 45.7% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
- 0.2% yield, vs GPOR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +198.5% vs GPOR's -5.6%
GPOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.14, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.68x
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 22.2x)
- Beta 0.14 vs MUX's 1.27
- 19.8% ROA vs USAU's -58.1%, ROIC 14.8% vs -126.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.0% revenue growth vs VGZ's -181.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.7% margin vs GORO's -6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs MUX's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, vs GPOR's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +198.5% vs GPOR's -5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs USAU's -58.1%, ROIC 14.8% vs -126.6% |
VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPOR leads in 4 of 6 categories
USAU leads 1 • MUX leads 1 • VGZ leads 0 • GORO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR and USAU operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GORO's -6.9%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $93M | $0 | $162M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $25M | -$17M | $61M | $884M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$6M | -$20M | $74M | $594M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$4M | -$15M | -$24M | $362M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +18.9% | — | +32.9% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.1% | — | +22.2% | +40.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.9% | — | +45.7% | +41.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.2% | — | -14.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% | — | -100.0% | +27.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +193.3% | +35.2% | +4.9% | +127.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, GPOR trades at a 79% valuation discount to MUX's 39.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPOR's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MUX's 74.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $326M | $231M | $273M | $1.4B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $297M | $265M | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.56x | -30.43x | -9.22x | 39.61x | 8.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.60x | — | 22.21x | 6.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.93x | — | 74.65x | 4.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.48x | — | 7.03x | 2.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.64x | 4.46x | 16.37x | 2.31x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 359.20x | — | — | 11.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-68 for USAU. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GORO scores 7/9 vs VGZ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.7% | -22.7% | -68.1% | +13.6% | +32.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.0% | -4.0% | -58.1% | +9.0% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +13.5% | -126.6% | -1.9% | +14.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.1% | +8.2% | -56.4% | -1.9% | +19.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.07x | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | $66M | -$8M | -$50M | $787M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $25M | $8M | $51M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $91M | $34,410 | $926,000 | $789M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.73x | — | -1.52x | 11.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAU leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPOR five years ago would be worth $24,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,415 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, MUX leads with a +198.5% total return vs GPOR's -5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAU at 55.1% vs GORO's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | +70.2% | -10.2% | +25.1% | -13.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +116.3% | +143.4% | +57.3% | +198.5% | -5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.9% | +50.5% | +272.8% | +163.5% | +96.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.4% | -45.8% | +53.3% | +79.8% | +145.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.9% | -47.8% | -68.0% | -0.1% | +145.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.9% | +14.6% | +55.1% | +38.1% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GPOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MUX's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPOR currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs USAU's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.38x | 1.02x | 1.27x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.13 | $1.87 | $23.75 | $29.70 | $225.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.91 | $0.43 | $9.75 | $6.88 | $160.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +76.5% | +69.9% | +78.7% | +79.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 47.9 | 58.2 | 51.0 | 34.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.8M | 276K | 992K | 320K |
Analyst Outlook
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VGZ as "Buy", GORO as "Buy", USAU as "Buy", MUX as "Buy", GPOR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 100.0% upside for VGZ (target: $5) vs 28.4% for MUX (target: $30). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.50 | $2.00 | $26.75 | $30.00 | $242.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.04 | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.0% |
GPOR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). USAU leads in 1 (Total Returns).
VGZ vs GORO vs USAU vs MUX vs GPOR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger pick with 44.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR?
On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.
3x versus McEwen Mining Inc. at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR?
Over the past 5 years, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) delivered a total return of +145.
1%, compared to -45. 8% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VGZ returned +220. 9% versus USAU's -68. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus McEwen Mining Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning MUX is approximately 785% more volatile than GPOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is pulling ahead at 44.
0% versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gulfport Energy Corporation grew EPS 245. 9% year-over-year, compared to -143. 2% for U. S. Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MUX leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR?
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -6. 9% for Gold Resource Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPOR leads at 70. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Gold Resource Corporation — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VGZ: 100. 0% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR?
In this comparison, MUX (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. VGZ, GORO, USAU, GPOR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VGZ or GORO or USAU or MUX or GPOR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), +145. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPOR: +145. 1%, MUX: -0. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VGZ and GORO and USAU and MUX and GPOR?
These companies operate in different sectors (VGZ (Basic Materials) and GORO (Basic Materials) and USAU (Basic Materials) and MUX (Basic Materials) and GPOR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VGZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; USAU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.