Gold
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Gold
VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Gold |
| Market Cap | $326M | $3.22B | $11.14B | $212M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.42B | $5.48B | $93M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $594M | $962M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.8% | 26.0% | 18.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 40.2% | 20.9% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | 8.1x | 26.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $789M | $5.14B | $91M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $2M | $210M | $25M |
VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ) | 100 | 197.4 | +97.4% |
| Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR) | 100 | 285.2 | +185.2% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | 100 | 278.4 | +178.4% |
| Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO) | 100 | 47.1 | -52.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VGZ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 220.9% 10Y total return vs GPOR's 144.4%
GPOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 43.0%, current ratio 0.68x
- Beta 0.05, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.68x
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 26.2x)
- 41.9% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
AR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.14
GORO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.0%, EPS growth 92.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.5%
- 44.0% revenue growth vs VGZ's -181.3%
- +134.1% vs GPOR's -5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.0% revenue growth vs VGZ's -181.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 26.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.9% margin vs GORO's -6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs VGZ's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.1% vs GPOR's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs VGZ's -31.0%, ROIC 14.8% vs -5.7% |
VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPOR leads in 3 of 6 categories
AR leads 2 • VGZ leads 1 • GORO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AR and VGZ operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. GPOR is the more profitable business, keeping 41.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GORO's -6.9%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.4B | $5.5B | $93M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $884M | $1.9B | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $594M | $962M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $362M | -$1.0B | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +47.8% | +26.0% | +18.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +40.2% | +20.9% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +41.9% | +17.5% | -6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +25.5% | -18.6% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.3% | +33.8% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +127.7% | +160.6% | +193.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, GPOR trades at a 53% valuation discount to AR's 17.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPOR's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GORO's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $326M | $3.2B | $11.1B | $212M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $4.0B | $16.1B | $278M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.56x | 8.30x | 17.70x | -27.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.90x | 8.10x | 26.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.97x | 10.15x | 11.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.43x | 2.22x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.64x | 1.79x | 1.46x | 4.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.68x | 8.96x | 329.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-33 for VGZ. GPOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AR scores 8/9 vs VGZ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.7% | +32.7% | +12.4% | -22.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.0% | +19.8% | +7.0% | -4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +14.8% | +5.2% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.1% | +19.3% | +6.8% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.43x | 0.67x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | $787M | $4.9B | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $2M | $210M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $789M | $5.1B | $91M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.16x | 14.47x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VGZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AR five years ago would be worth $32,643 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,055 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, GORO leads with a +134.1% total return vs GPOR's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VGZ at 46.9% vs GORO's 11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | -13.5% | +5.1% | +56.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.6% | -5.3% | -3.9% | +134.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.9% | +95.5% | +71.9% | +37.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.5% | +144.4% | +226.4% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.9% | +144.4% | +43.1% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.9% | +25.0% | +19.8% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
GPOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VGZ's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPOR currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs GORO's 70.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 0.05x | 0.14x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.13 | $225.78 | $45.75 | $1.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.91 | $160.95 | $29.10 | $0.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +79.0% | +78.6% | +70.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 33.4 | 38.3 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 320K | 5.6M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
AR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VGZ as "Buy", GPOR as "Buy", AR as "Buy", GORO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 100.0% upside for VGZ (target: $5) vs 33.7% for GPOR (target: $238).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.50 | $238.33 | $48.89 | $2.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | 50 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
GPOR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
VGZ vs GPOR vs AR vs GORO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger pick with 44.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 7% for Antero Resources Corporation (AR). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vista Gold Corp. (VGZ) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO?
On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.
3x versus Antero Resources Corporation at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO?
Over the past 5 years, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) delivered a total return of +226.
4%, compared to -49. 5% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VGZ returned +220. 9% versus GORO's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Vista Gold Corp. 's 1. 32β — meaning VGZ is approximately 2774% more volatile than GPOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is pulling ahead at 44.
0% versus 21. 7% for Antero Resources Corporation (AR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Antero Resources Corporation grew EPS 1028% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Vista Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GORO leads at -12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO?
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -6. 9% for Gold Resource Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus 0. 0% for VGZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPOR leads at 70. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Gold Resource Corporation — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VGZ: 100. 0% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VGZ or GPOR or AR or GORO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), +144. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPOR: +144. 4%, VGZ: +220. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VGZ and GPOR and AR and GORO?
These companies operate in different sectors (VGZ (Basic Materials) and GPOR (Energy) and AR (Energy) and GORO (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VGZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.