Chemicals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Construction Materials
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Software - Application | Construction Materials | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $410M | $5.30B | $6.78B | $839M | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $8.31B | $2.30B | $1.88B | $2.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $14M | $447M | $-134M | $-359M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 10.8% | 29.0% | 10.1% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | -4.2% | 25.4% | -3.3% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.2x | 36.0x | 16.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $612M | $454M | $1.28B | $577M | $3.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $223M | $199M | $20M | $37M | $211M |
VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valhi, Inc. (VHI) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) | 100 | 152.3 | +52.3% |
| Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO) | 100 | 42.9 | -57.1% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VHI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 44.8%, current ratio 2.80x
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.80x
- Better valuation composite
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
EXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 192.8% 10Y total return vs KRO's 133.2%
- 19.4% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
- 13.1% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 17.6% vs -0.3%
Among these 5 stocks, KRO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TROX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and momentum.
- 3.4% yield, vs EXP's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +77.6% vs VHI's -18.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs TROX's 2.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, vs EXP's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs VHI's -18.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 17.6% vs -0.3% |
VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXP leads in 2 of 6 categories
VHI leads 1 • TROX leads 1 • COMP leads 0 • KRO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 4.4x KRO's $1.9B. EXP is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $8.3B | $2.3B | $1.9B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$100M | $748M | -$13M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | $14M | $447M | -$134M | -$359M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $16M | $244M | $25M | -$275M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +10.8% | +29.0% | +10.1% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -4.2% | +25.4% | -3.3% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +0.2% | +19.4% | -7.1% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +0.2% | +10.6% | +1.3% | -9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +99.4% | +2.5% | +4.1% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.1% | +133.3% | -0.7% | -126.1% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VHI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EXP's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 66.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $410M | $5.3B | $6.8B | $839M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $799M | $5.6B | $8.0B | $1.4B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.17x | -87.20x | 15.28x | -7.59x | -2.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.18x | 35.96x | 16.30x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.29x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.14x | 66.64x | 10.60x | 60.22x | 17.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.76x | 3.00x | 0.45x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 6.34x | 4.86x | 1.12x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.09x | 19.18x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXP delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. VHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXP scores 5/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | +1.1% | +29.1% | -17.0% | -30.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +0.4% | +13.1% | -7.2% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | -2.5% | +17.6% | -2.5% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | -2.9% | +20.9% | -2.9% | -0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.58x | 0.88x | 0.77x | 2.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $389M | $255M | $1.3B | $540M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $223M | $199M | $20M | $37M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $612M | $454M | $1.3B | $577M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.68x | -0.12x | 9.77x | -3.01x | -1.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — COMP and EXP and TROX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXP five years ago would be worth $14,436 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,719 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +77.6% total return vs VHI's -18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 48.9% vs TROX's -7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | -17.0% | -0.4% | +63.8% | +107.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.2% | +12.8% | -8.0% | +3.7% | +77.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.8% | +230.3% | +33.4% | +2.1% | -20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | -46.6% | +44.4% | -41.7% | -52.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -56.7% | +192.8% | +133.2% | +123.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +48.9% | +10.1% | +0.7% | -7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VHI and KRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VHI is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRO currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs COMP's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 2.03x | 1.31x | 1.62x | 2.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $13.96 | $243.64 | $7.90 | $10.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.44 | $5.66 | $171.99 | $4.08 | $2.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +62.5% | +86.4% | +92.3% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 59.3 | 57.8 | 52.7 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 14.2M | 389K | 351K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TROX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VHI as "Sell", COMP as "Buy", EXP as "Buy", KRO as "Hold", TROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.2% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs -31.4% for KRO (target: $5). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.43% vs EXP's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.06 | $223.80 | $5.00 | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 24 | 7 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — | +0.5% | +2.7% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — | $1.00 | $0.20 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EXP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VHI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
VHI vs COMP vs EXP vs KRO vs TROX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX?
On forward P/E, Valhi, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX?
Over the past 5 years, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) delivered a total return of +44. 4%, compared to -52. 8% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXP returned +192. 8% versus COMP's -56. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Valhi, Inc.
(VHI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 38β — meaning TROX is approximately 124% more volatile than VHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Valhi, Inc. (VHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXP leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX?
Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXP leads at 26. 5% versus -2. 3% for KRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXP leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Valhi, Inc.
(VHI) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 36. 0x for Compass, Inc. — 31. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 61. 2% to $14. 06.
08Which pays a better dividend — VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX?
In this comparison, TROX (3.
4% yield), KRO (2. 7% yield), VHI (2. 2% yield), EXP (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. COMP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VHI or COMP or EXP or KRO or TROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Valhi, Inc.
(VHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 2% yield). Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VHI: -3. 0%, COMP: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VHI and COMP and EXP and KRO and TROX?
These companies operate in different sectors (VHI (Basic Materials) and COMP (Technology) and EXP (Basic Materials) and KRO (Basic Materials) and TROX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VHI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. VHI, KRO, TROX pay a dividend while COMP, EXP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.