Chemicals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Aluminum
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Security & Protection Services | Aluminum | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $410M | $292M | $2.92B | $839M | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $159M | $3.70B | $1.88B | $5.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $-34M | $153M | $-134M | $-411M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 31.1% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | 6.6% | 6.6% | -3.3% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.2x | 6.9x | 17.6x | — | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $612M | $500K | $1.12B | $577M | $4.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $223M | $114M | $7M | $37M | $672M |
VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valhi, Inc. (VHI) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
| NL Industries, Inc. (NL) | 100 | 190.7 | +90.7% |
| Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU) | 100 | 251.3 | +151.3% |
| Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| The Chemours Company (CC) | 100 | 175.7 | +75.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 15.9x)
NL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 7.77x
- Beta 0.86, yield 9.5%, current ratio 7.77x
- Beta 0.86 vs CC's 1.81, lower leverage
KALU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 135.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
- 11.5% revenue growth vs KRO's -1.5%
- 4.1% margin vs NL's -21.5%
- +168.1% vs NL's -22.0%
KRO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 226.5% 10Y total return vs NL's 224.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.5% revenue growth vs KRO's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs NL's -21.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs CC's 1.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.5% yield, vs VHI's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +168.1% vs NL's -22.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs KRO's -7.2%, ROIC 7.8% vs -2.5% |
VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KALU leads in 3 of 6 categories
VHI leads 1 • NL leads 1 • KRO leads 0 • CC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KALU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 36.7x NL's $159M. KALU is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NL's -21.5%. On growth, KALU holds the edge at +42.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $159M | $3.7B | $1.9B | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $13M | $368M | -$13M | -$132M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | -$34M | $153M | -$134M | -$411M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $4M | $24M | $25M | $198M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +31.1% | +10.2% | +10.1% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +6.6% | +6.6% | -3.3% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -21.5% | +4.1% | -7.1% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +2.6% | +0.7% | +1.3% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +0.7% | +42.4% | +4.1% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.1% | +8.0% | +183.2% | -126.1% | -6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VHI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KALU's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRO's 60.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $410M | $292M | $2.9B | $839M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $799M | $178M | $4.0B | $1.4B | $7.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.17x | -7.75x | 26.64x | -7.59x | -9.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.18x | 6.86x | 17.62x | — | 15.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.14x | 13.53x | 12.89x | 60.22x | 22.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 1.84x | 0.87x | 0.45x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 0.77x | 3.63x | 1.12x | 13.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 67.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KALU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KALU delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-163 for CC. NL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CC's 18.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KALU scores 6/9 vs CC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | -8.7% | +18.7% | -17.0% | -163.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -7.0% | +5.9% | -7.2% | -5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +2.8% | +7.8% | -2.5% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +2.0% | +9.4% | -2.9% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.00x | 1.36x | 0.77x | 18.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $389M | -$113M | $1.1B | $540M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $223M | $114M | $7M | $37M | $672M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $612M | $500,000 | $1.1B | $577M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.68x | -291.84x | 4.84x | -3.01x | 1.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KALU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KALU five years ago would be worth $14,686 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,636 for VHI. Over the past 12 months, KALU leads with a +168.1% total return vs NL's -22.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KALU at 44.2% vs CC's -4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | +11.2% | +51.2% | +63.8% | +88.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.2% | -22.0% | +168.1% | +3.7% | +108.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.8% | +31.5% | +200.1% | +2.1% | -13.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | +20.6% | +46.9% | -41.7% | -19.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | +224.6% | +139.9% | +133.2% | +226.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +9.6% | +44.2% | +0.7% | -4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NL and KALU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NL is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CC's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KALU currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs NL's 67.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.86x | 1.72x | 1.62x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $8.81 | $183.00 | $7.90 | $28.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.44 | $5.04 | $66.59 | $4.08 | $9.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +67.8% | +98.5% | +92.3% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 54.7 | 68.4 | 52.7 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 38K | 246K | 351K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
NL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VHI as "Sell", NL as "Sell", KALU as "Hold", KRO as "Hold", CC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for CC (target: $24) vs -31.4% for KRO (target: $5). For income investors, NL offers the higher dividend yield at 9.55% vs KALU's 1.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $165.33 | $5.00 | $24.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +9.5% | +1.7% | +2.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.57 | $3.09 | $0.20 | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KALU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VHI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VHI vs NL vs KALU vs KRO vs CC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO). Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC?
On forward P/E, Valhi, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC?
Over the past 5 years, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) delivered a total return of +46.
9%, compared to -43. 6% for Valhi, Inc. (VHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CC returned +226. 5% versus VHI's -3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NL Industries, Inc.
(NL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus The Chemours Company's 1. 81β — meaning CC is approximately 111% more volatile than NL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NL Industries, Inc. (NL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 18% for The Chemours Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -1. 5% for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to -549. 1% for The Chemours Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, KALU leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC?
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
3% net margin versus -23. 9% for NL Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NL leads at 6. 0% versus -2. 3% for KRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NL leads at 30. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Valhi, Inc.
(VHI) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 6x for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CC: 4. 8% to $24. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NL Industries, Inc. (NL) offers the highest yield at 9. 5%, versus 1. 7% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU).
09Is VHI or NL or KALU or KRO or CC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NL Industries, Inc.
(NL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 9. 5% yield, +224. 6% 10Y return). The Chemours Company (CC) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NL: +224. 6%, CC: +226. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VHI and NL and KALU and KRO and CC?
These companies operate in different sectors (VHI (Basic Materials) and NL (Industrials) and KALU (Basic Materials) and KRO (Basic Materials) and CC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VHI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KALU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.