Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VIA vs GRAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
VIA vs GRAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $14.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $399M | $3.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $379M |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -18.8% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $2.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $3.43B |
Quick Verdict: VIA vs GRAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.25
- Rev growth 35.7%, EPS growth 23.5%
- -65.1% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -68.3%
GRAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 10.7% margin vs VIA's -25.8%
- -22.1% vs VIA's -65.1%
- 3.3% ROA vs VIA's -14.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -29.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.7% revenue growth vs GRAB's 20.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs VIA's -25.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs GRAB's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.1% vs VIA's -65.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs VIA's -14.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -29.7% |
VIA vs GRAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VIA vs GRAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRAB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 8.9x VIA's $399M. GRAB is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIA's -25.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $399M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$67M | $395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $379M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.6% | +43.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.8% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.8% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VIA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $15.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.95x | 59.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.95x | 4.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 111.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRAB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRAB delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-18 for VIA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VIA scores 5/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.9% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.7% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.8% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.28x | 2.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIA five years ago would be worth $3,493 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,184 for GRAB. Over the past 12 months, GRAB leads with a -22.1% total return vs VIA's -65.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRAB at 4.1% vs VIA's -29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.4% | -25.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.1% | -22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.1% | +12.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.1% | -68.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.1% | -68.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.6% | +4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIA and GRAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIA is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRAB's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRAB currently trades 56.9% from its 52-week high vs VIA's 30.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.31 | $6.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.11 | $3.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.7% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 770K | 47.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VIA as "Buy" and GRAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 115.4% upside for VIA (target: $37) vs 77.7% for GRAB (target: $7).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.25 | $6.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
GRAB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VIA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VIA vs GRAB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIA or GRAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Via Transportation, Inc.
(VIA) is the stronger pick with 35. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 5% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) offers the better valuation at 59. 2x trailing P/E (34. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Via Transportation, Inc. (VIA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VIA or GRAB?
Over the past 5 years, Via Transportation, Inc.
(VIA) delivered a total return of -65. 1%, compared to -68. 2% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIA returned -65. 1% versus GRAB's -68. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VIA or GRAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Via Transportation, Inc.
(VIA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Grab Holdings Limited's 1. 42β — meaning GRAB is approximately 14% more volatile than VIA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — VIA or GRAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Via Transportation, Inc.
(VIA) is pulling ahead at 35. 7% versus 20. 5% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grab Holdings Limited grew EPS 342. 2% year-over-year, compared to 23. 5% for Via Transportation, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VIA or GRAB?
Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
0% net margin versus -26. 7% for Via Transportation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRAB leads at 6. 0% versus -24. 8% for VIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VIA or GRAB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIA: 115.
4% to $37. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — VIA or GRAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VIA or GRAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Via Transportation, Inc.
(VIA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIA: -65. 1%, GRAB: -68. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VIA and GRAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.