Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VIRC vs SCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Business Equipment & Supplies
VIRC vs SCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $97M | $1.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $237M | $3.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $95M |
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $601M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $346M |
VIRC vs SCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virco Mfg. Corporat… (VIRC) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Steelcase Inc. (SCS) | 100 | 140.7 | +40.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIRC vs SCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 1.4%
- 73.3% 10Y total return vs SCS's 38.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.3%, current ratio 2.98x
SCS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth 50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 0.2% revenue growth vs VIRC's -1.1%
- +64.9% vs VIRC's -23.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.2% revenue growth vs VIRC's -1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs SCS's 2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs SCS's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SCS's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.9% vs VIRC's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs SCS's 4.1%, ROIC 18.8% vs 9.9% |
VIRC vs SCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VIRC vs SCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 13.8x VIRC's $237M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (VIRC) to 2.9% (SCS). On growth, SCS holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $237M | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $207M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.6% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.5% | -43.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VIRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, VIRC trades at a 70% valuation discount to SCS's 15.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VIRC's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SCS's 8.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $112M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.67x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.69x | 14.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.09x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.34x | 8.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.62x | 18.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VIRC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VIRC delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for SCS. VIRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCS's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCS scores 6/9 vs VIRC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.0% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | $254M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $601M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.34x | 5.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIRC five years ago would be worth $19,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,641 for SCS. Over the past 12 months, SCS leads with a +64.9% total return vs VIRC's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCS at 30.0% vs VIRC's 19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | +64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +119.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +26.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.3% | +38.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.9% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIRC and SCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCS's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCS currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs VIRC's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.36 | $17.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.16 | $9.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.9% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VIRC and SCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VIRC as "Buy" and SCS as "Hold". For income investors, SCS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs VIRC's 1.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +2.0% |
VIRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SCS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VIRC vs SCS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIRC or SCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC). Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIRC or SCS?
On trailing P/E, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Steelcase Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Virco Mfg. Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIRC or SCS?
Over the past 5 years, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) delivered a total return of +97. 1%, compared to +26. 4% for Steelcase Inc. (SCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIRC returned +73. 3% versus SCS's +38. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIRC or SCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Steelcase Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning SCS is approximately 138% more volatile than VIRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 63% for Steelcase Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIRC or SCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -1. 1% for Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Steelcase Inc. grew EPS 50. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Virco Mfg. Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIRC leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIRC or SCS?
Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus 3. 8% for Steelcase Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIRC leads at 10. 5% versus 5. 0% for SCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIRC leads at 43. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIRC or SCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Steelcase Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIRC or SCS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Steelcase Inc. (SCS) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 4% for Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC).
09Is VIRC or SCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virco Mfg.
Corporation (VIRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 4% yield). Steelcase Inc. (SCS) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIRC: +73. 3%, SCS: +38. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIRC and SCS?
These companies operate in different sectors (VIRC (Consumer Cyclical) and SCS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.