Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VIST vs TTE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
VIST vs TTE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $6.86B | $197.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.90B | $183.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $744M | $15.07B |
| Gross Margin | 45.3% | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | 45.7% | 12.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.30B | $61.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $526M | $26.20B |
VIST vs TTE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vista Energy, S.A.B… (VIST) | 100 | 2237.8 | +2137.8% |
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 100 | 236.1 | +136.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIST vs TTE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 50.2%, EPS growth 44.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs TTE's 176.8%
- 50.2% revenue growth vs TTE's -6.8%
TTE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.05, Low D/E 52.3%, current ratio 0.97x
- Beta -0.05, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.97x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.2% revenue growth vs TTE's -6.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 8.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.6% margin vs TTE's 8.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (52.3% vs 131.3%) | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.4% vs VIST's +46.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs TTE's 5.1%, ROIC 16.2% vs 9.9% |
VIST vs TTE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VIST vs TTE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTE is the larger business by revenue, generating $184.0B annually — 63.4x VIST's $2.9B. VIST is the more profitable business, keeping 25.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTE's 8.2%. On growth, VIST holds the edge at +97.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $184.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $38.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $744M | $15.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$853M | $11.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +30.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -29.4% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.3% | +3.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.5% | +57.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VIST leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, VIST trades at a 36% valuation discount to TTE's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VIST's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTE's 6.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $197.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.6B | $232.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.80x | 15.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.18x | 8.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.15x | 6.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.81x | 1.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VIST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VIST delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $13 for TTE. TTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIST's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTE scores 5/9 vs VIST's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.2% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.9% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $526M | $26.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $61.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.74x | 9.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIST five years ago would be worth $240,109 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,528 for TTE. Over the past 12 months, TTE leads with a +70.4% total return vs VIST's +46.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIST at 46.3% vs TTE's 19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | +37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.3% | +70.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.8% | +72.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2301.1% | +145.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +557.9% | +176.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.3% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TTE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTE is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VIST's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TTE currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs VIST's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | -0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.20 | $93.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.63 | $57.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TTE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VIST as "Buy" and TTE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for VIST (target: $71) vs -15.5% for TTE (target: $75). TTE is the only dividend payer here at 4.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.07 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +4.1% |
VIST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TTE leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
VIST vs TTE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIST or TTE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vista Energy, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VIST) is the stronger pick with 50. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). Vista Energy, S. A. B. de C. V. (VIST) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vista Energy, S. A. B. de C. V. (VIST) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIST or TTE?
On trailing P/E, Vista Energy, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VIST) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus TotalEnergies SE at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, Vista Energy, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIST or TTE?
Over the past 5 years, Vista Energy, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VIST) delivered a total return of +23. 0%, compared to +145. 3% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIST returned +557. 9% versus TTE's +176. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIST or TTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
05β versus Vista Energy, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 32β — meaning VIST is approximately -795% more volatile than TTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 131% for Vista Energy, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIST or TTE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vista Energy, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VIST) is pulling ahead at 50. 2% versus -6. 8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vista Energy, S. A. B. de C. V. grew EPS 44. 9% year-over-year, compared to -13. 6% for TotalEnergies SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIST leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIST or TTE?
Vista Energy, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VIST) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 1% net margin versus 7. 2% for TotalEnergies SE — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIST leads at 33. 5% versus 10. 9% for TTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIST leads at 47. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIST or TTE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vista Energy, S.
A. B. de C. V. (VIST) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 8. 4x for TotalEnergies SE — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIST: 8. 0% to $71. 07.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIST or TTE?
In this comparison, TTE (4.
3% yield) pays a dividend. VIST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VIST or TTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
05), 4. 3% yield, +176. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTE: +176. 8%, VIST: +557. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIST and TTE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VIST is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTE is a mid-cap deep-value stock. TTE pays a dividend while VIST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.