Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VLO vs DK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
VLO vs DK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $70.78B | $2.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126.17B | $10.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.21B | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 7.2% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $11.70B | $3.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.69B | $626M |
VLO vs DK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valero Energy Corpo… (VLO) | 100 | 355.2 | +255.2% |
| Delek US Holdings, … (DK) | 100 | 228.8 | +128.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VLO vs DK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VLO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth -5.5%, EPS growth -11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.4%
- 394.8% 10Y total return vs DK's 253.9%
DK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +229.9% vs VLO's +106.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.5% revenue growth vs DK's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs DK's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs DK's 0.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs DK's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +229.9% vs VLO's +106.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs DK's -0.7%, ROIC 9.5% vs 9.9% |
VLO vs DK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VLO vs DK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.2B annually — 11.8x DK's $10.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (VLO) to -0.5% (DK). On growth, VLO holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126.2B | $10.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.0B | $754M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.2B | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.9B | $479M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | -20.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VLO and DK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DK's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VLO's 10.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70.8B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $77.8B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.27x | -118.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.04x | 11.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.41x | 6.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | 4.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.07x | 125.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VLO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VLO delivers a 15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-13 for DK. VLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DK's 6.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VLO scores 6/9 vs DK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.7% | -12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 6.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.0B | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.7B | $626M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.7B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.63x | 1.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VLO five years ago would be worth $32,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,812 for DK. Over the past 12 months, DK leads with a +229.9% total return vs VLO's +106.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VLO at 32.5% vs DK's 31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.9% | +52.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +106.2% | +229.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.6% | +125.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.2% | +98.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +394.8% | +253.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.5% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
VLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VLO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DK's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $258.43 | $49.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.65 | $13.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VLO and DK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VLO as "Buy" and DK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.5% upside for DK (target: $44) vs -9.3% for VLO (target: $215). For income investors, DK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.27% vs VLO's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $214.67 | $44.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.55 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +2.9% |
VLO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
VLO vs DK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VLO or DK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is the stronger pick with -5.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VLO or DK?
On forward P/E, Valero Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VLO or DK?
Over the past 5 years, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) delivered a total return of +220.
2%, compared to +98. 1% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VLO returned +394. 8% versus DK's +253. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VLO or DK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Delek US Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning DK is approximately 22% more volatile than VLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 6% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VLO or DK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is pulling ahead at -5.
5% versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delek US Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 95. 7% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for Valero Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VLO leads at -11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VLO or DK?
Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
9% net margin versus -0. 2% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DK leads at 3. 7% versus 3. 5% for VLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DK leads at 5. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VLO or DK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) trades at 10.
0x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Delek US Holdings, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DK: -1. 5% to $44. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — VLO or DK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 9% for Valero Energy Corporation (VLO).
09Is VLO or DK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 1. 9% yield, +394. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VLO: +394. 8%, DK: +253. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VLO and DK?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.