Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VNRX vs NTRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
VNRX vs NTRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $13M | $31.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $2.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-208M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -12.5% | -13.4% |
| Total Debt | $11M | $214M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.08B |
VNRX vs NTRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Natera, Inc. (NTRA) | 100 | 501.3 | +401.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNRX vs NTRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VNRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.17
- Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 78.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, current ratio 0.17x
NTRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 20.9% 10Y total return vs VNRX's -96.2%
- -9.0% margin vs VNRX's -13.5%
- +37.3% vs VNRX's -76.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.0% revenue growth vs NTRA's 35.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -9.0% margin vs VNRX's -13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs NTRA's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs VNRX's -76.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -10.6% ROA vs VNRX's -305.6% |
VNRX vs NTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VNRX vs NTRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 1335.0x VNRX's $2M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -9.0% (NTRA) to -13.5% (VNRX). On growth, VNRX holds the edge at +133.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$208M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $97M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +64.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.5% | -13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.2% | +39.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.5% | +185.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VNRX and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $31.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $30.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.55x | -144.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.49x | 13.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 285.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTRA scores 5/9 vs VNRX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -10.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -36.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -18.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$862M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $214M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.44x | -25.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $388 for VNRX. Over the past 12 months, NTRA leads with a +37.3% total return vs VNRX's -76.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs VNRX's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.7% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -76.7% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.0% | +314.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +115.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +2089.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.7% | +60.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VNRX and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VNRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTRA's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRA currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs VNRX's 12.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.80 | $256.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $131.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.9% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.6 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 714K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $262.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NTRA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
VNRX vs NTRA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNRX or NTRA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) is the stronger pick with 40.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 35. 9% for Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Analysts rate Natera, Inc. (NTRA) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VNRX or NTRA?
Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -96. 1% for VolitionRx Limited (VNRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus VNRX's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VNRX or NTRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Natera, Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning NTRA is approximately 621% more volatile than VNRX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — VNRX or NTRA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) is pulling ahead at 40.
0% versus 35. 9% for Natera, Inc. (NTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VolitionRx Limited grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for Natera, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNRX leads at 78. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VNRX or NTRA?
Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) is the more profitable company, earning -9. 0% net margin versus -1352. 2% for VolitionRx Limited — meaning it keeps -9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTRA leads at -13. 4% versus -1228. 6% for VNRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VNRX or NTRA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VNRX or NTRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VolitionRx Limited (VNRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VNRX: -96. 2%, NTRA: +20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VNRX and NTRA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.