Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $36.55B | $176.40B | $198.61B | $210.16B | $22.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74.17B | $126.52B | $138.19B | $90.53B | $24.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.03B | $21.41B | $17.17B | $10.54B | $6.30B |
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | 79.7% | 55.7% | 54.3% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 19.4% | 21.2% | 20.4% | 43.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 10.9x | 9.5x | 18.5x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $57.41B | $173.99B | $200.59B | $122.27B | $41.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.88B | $18.23B | $19.05B | $5.60B | $320M |
VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD) | 100 | 95.0 | -5.0% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
| BCE Inc. (BCE) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 98.6%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.36, yield 5.1%, current ratio 1.20x
- Lower D/E ratio (98.6% vs 206.5%)
- +72.6% vs TMUS's -21.2%
Among these 5 stocks, T doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.8%
- 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BCE's 7.0%
TMUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 407.2% 10Y total return vs T's 41.9%
- 8.5% revenue growth vs BCE's 0.2%
BCE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.43 vs TMUS's 0.62
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.43 vs 0.62
- 25.8% margin vs VOD's -4.1%
- 8.3% ROA vs VOD's -2.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs -0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs BCE's 0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.43 vs 0.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.8% margin vs VOD's -4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (98.6% vs 206.5%) | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BCE's 7.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.6% vs TMUS's -21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs VOD's -2.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs -0.3% |
VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCE leads in 2 of 6 categories
VOD leads 1 • T leads 0 • VZ leads 0 • TMUS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 5.7x BCE's $24.4B. BCE is the more profitable business, keeping 25.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VOD's -4.1%. On growth, VOD holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74.2B | $126.5B | $138.2B | $90.5B | $24.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.2B | $45.1B | $47.6B | $29.9B | $16.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.0B | $21.4B | $17.2B | $10.5B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21.9B | $10.6B | $19.8B | $10.7B | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +79.7% | +55.7% | +54.3% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +19.4% | +21.2% | +20.4% | +43.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +16.9% | +12.4% | +11.6% | +25.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | +8.4% | +14.3% | +11.8% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | +2.9% | +2.0% | +10.6% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -11.5% | -53.4% | -12.0% | +27.5% |
Valuation Metrics
VOD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, BCE trades at a 75% valuation discount to TMUS's 20.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCE offers better value at 0.23x vs TMUS's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36.6B | $176.4B | $198.6B | $210.2B | $22.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $90.0B | $332.2B | $380.2B | $326.8B | $52.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.34x | 8.31x | 11.60x | 19.98x | 4.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.39x | 10.93x | 9.52x | 18.45x | 9.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.67x | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.37x | 7.37x | 7.99x | 10.13x | 6.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 1.40x | 1.44x | 2.38x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.60x | 1.41x | 1.88x | 3.71x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.59x | 9.07x | 9.87x | 20.32x | 9.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VOD. VOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), T scores 7/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.2% | +16.8% | +16.4% | +17.8% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +5.1% | +4.4% | +4.9% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +6.7% | +8.0% | +8.1% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +6.8% | +8.8% | +9.8% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 1.35x | 1.90x | 2.07x | 1.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45.5B | $155.8B | $181.5B | $116.7B | $40.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.9B | $18.2B | $19.0B | $5.6B | $320M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57.4B | $174.0B | $200.6B | $122.3B | $41.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.18x | 4.97x | 4.39x | 5.33x | 5.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — T and TMUS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth $14,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,637 for BCE. Over the past 12 months, VOD leads with a +72.6% total return vs TMUS's -21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 18.6% vs BCE's -13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +5.1% | +19.7% | -2.2% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.6% | -6.2% | +13.6% | -21.2% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.9% | +67.0% | +45.9% | +40.4% | -34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.6% | +29.9% | +2.8% | +45.5% | -23.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.9% | +41.9% | +41.6% | +407.2% | +8.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.5% | +18.6% | +13.4% | +12.0% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VOD and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VOD's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VOD currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs TMUS's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | -0.26x | -0.11x | -0.28x | -0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.22 | $29.79 | $51.68 | $261.56 | $26.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.98 | $22.95 | $10.60 | $181.36 | $21.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +84.8% | +91.1% | +74.2% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 38.9 | 49.3 | 45.5 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 33.7M | 24.3M | 5.6M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VZ and BCE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VOD as "Buy", T as "Hold", VZ as "Hold", TMUS as "Buy", BCE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.8% upside for TMUS (target: $254) vs -26.2% for VOD (target: $12). For income investors, BCE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.99% vs TMUS's 1.88%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.58 | $29.42 | $51.56 | $254.08 | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 62 | 60 | 54 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +4.5% | +5.8% | +1.9% | +7.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $1.14 | $2.71 | $3.64 | $2.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.0% | +2.6% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +0.7% |
BCE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
VOD vs T vs VZ vs TMUS vs BCE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for BCE Inc. (BCE). BCE Inc. (BCE) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (VOD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE?
On trailing P/E, BCE Inc.
(BCE) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, BCE Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BCE Inc. wins at 0. 43x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. 's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE?
Over the past 5 years, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) delivered a total return of +45. 5%, compared to -23. 6% for BCE Inc. (BCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +407. 2% versus VOD's -15. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Vodafone Group Public Limited Company's 0. 36β — meaning VOD is approximately -228% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (VOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus 0. 2% for BCE Inc. (BCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BCE Inc. grew EPS 36. 7% year-over-year, compared to -481. 0% for Vodafone Group Public Limited Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMUS leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE?
BCE Inc.
(BCE) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 8% net margin versus -11. 1% for Vodafone Group Public Limited Company — meaning it keeps 25. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCE leads at 22. 2% versus -1. 1% for VOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BCE Inc. (BCE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 43x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. 's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BCE Inc. (BCE) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for T-Mobile US, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMUS: 30. 8% to $254. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BCE Inc. (BCE) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 1. 9% for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).
09Is VOD or T or VZ or TMUS or BCE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +407. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +407. 2%, VOD: -15. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VOD and T and VZ and TMUS and BCE?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VOD is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BCE is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 14%
- Gross Margin > 20%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 2.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.