Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VOR logo
VOR
ILMN logo
ILMN
BEAM logo
BEAM
PACB logo
PACB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VOR
Vor Biopharma Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$25.25B
5Y Perf.-61.1%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.02B
5Y Perf.-67.0%
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$419M
5Y Perf.-95.6%

VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VOR logoVOR
ILMN logoILMN
BEAM logoBEAM
PACB logoPACB
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnologyMedical - Devices
Market Cap$97M$25.25B$3.02B$419M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$4.39B$132M$160M
Net Income (TTM)$-883M$853M$-65M$-129M
Gross Margin67.1%-64.2%37.1%
Operating Margin20.9%-281.0%-101.7%
Forward P/E31.8x
Total Debt$3M$2.55B$294M$759M
Cash & Equiv.$396M$1.42B$295M$64M

VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VOR
ILMN
BEAM
PACB
StockFeb 21Jun 26Return
Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR)1001.6-98.4%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10038.9-61.1%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)10033.0-67.0%
Pacific Biosciences… (PACB)1004.4-95.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Vor Biopharma Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. BEAM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ILMN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VOR
Vor Biopharma Inc.
The Defensive Pick

VOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.90, current ratio 18.20x
  • +220.2% vs PACB's +16.4%
Best for: defensive
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.04
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 93.8%, current ratio 2.08x
  • 19.4% margin vs PACB's -80.3%
  • Beta 1.04 vs PACB's 2.92, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Play

BEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
  • 56.9% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 22.4%
  • 120.0% revenue growth vs VOR's -6.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
The Secondary Option

PACB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBEAM logoBEAM120.0% revenue growth vs VOR's -6.6%
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs PACB's -80.3%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 1.04 vs PACB's 2.92, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)VOR logoVOR+220.2% vs PACB's +16.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs VOR's -261.2%

VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
VORVor Biopharma Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M
BEAMBeam Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PACBPacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
45.9%$136M
Consumable
27.7%$82M
Instrument
18.2%$54M
Service And Other
8.2%$24M

VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGPACB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN and VOR operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACB's -80.3%. On growth, ILMN holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$4.4B$132M$160M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$371M$1.1B-$355M-$151M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$883M$853M-$65M-$129M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$151M$989M-$384M-$116M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.1%-64.2%+37.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.9%-2.8%-101.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.4%-49.2%-80.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.5%-2.9%-72.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.8%-100.0%+0.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-97.2%+6.1%+26.6%+97.9%
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Market CapShares × price$97M$25.2B$3.0B$419M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$297M$26.4B$3.0B$1.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.20x30.50x-36.31x-0.74x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple23.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.82x21.62x2.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.52x2.35x75.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.12x
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-5 for PACB. BEAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs PACB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+32.8%-5.9%-4.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+13.4%-4.6%-16.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.8%-31.1%-45.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-132.0%+17.6%-33.3%-58.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93843
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.94x0.24x141.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$393M$1.1B-$1M$696M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$396M$1.4B$295M$64M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$2.6B$294M$759M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.09x1.08x-44.67x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BEAM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $331 for VOR. Over the past 12 months, VOR leads with a +220.2% total return vs PACB's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEAM at -3.7% vs PACB's -54.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.0%+23.7%+8.4%-26.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+220.2%+89.9%+64.4%+16.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.7%-17.8%-10.8%-90.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.7%-62.3%-66.9%-95.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+22.4%+56.9%-86.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-47.7%-6.3%-3.7%-54.0%
BEAM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACB's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs VOR's 21.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.90x1.04x2.27x2.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$65.80$177.22$36.44$2.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.63$85.77$15.60$1.09
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+21.4%+93.8%+80.7%+49.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.063.348.746.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded922K1.6M1.9M6.1M
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VOR as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", PACB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.8% upside for VOR (target: $32) vs -25.9% for PACB (target: $1).

MetricVOR logoVORVor Biopharma Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.67$151.40$48.00$1.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts13502718
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BEAM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VOR vs ILMN vs BEAM vs PACB: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (31. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB?

Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -96. 7% for Vor Biopharma Inc. (VOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEAM returned +56. 9% versus VOR's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning PACB is approximately 181% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -107. 4% for Vor Biopharma Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -341. 5% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -348. 5% for PACB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEAM leads at 84. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VOR: 124.

8% to $31. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is VOR or ILMN or BEAM or PACB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +22. 4%, PACB: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between VOR and ILMN and BEAM and PACB?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.