Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $116M | $632M | $2.23B | $262M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $270M | $671M | $3.71B | $1.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $27M | $-504M | $-78M |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 54.2% | 61.4% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | -12.0% | 4.4% | -1.8% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.3x | 13.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $71M | $58M | $3.10B | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $231M | $166M | $96M |
VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) | 100 | 262.6 | +162.6% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
| Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) | 100 | 147.2 | +47.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.25
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 53.6%, current ratio 2.37x
- Beta 1.25, current ratio 2.37x
- Beta 1.25 vs FOSL's 2.46, lower leverage
MOV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.7%
- 36.8% 10Y total return vs VRA's -75.1%
- 2.7% revenue growth vs VRA's -27.5%
- 4.0% margin vs VRA's -17.7%
CPRI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
FOSL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +259.2% vs CPRI's +18.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.7% revenue growth vs VRA's -27.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs VRA's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs FOSL's 2.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +259.2% vs CPRI's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs VRA's -18.9%, ROIC 6.3% vs -11.8% |
VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MOV leads in 2 of 6 categories
VRA leads 2 • FOSL leads 1 • CPRI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 13.8x VRA's $270M. MOV is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRA's -17.7%. On growth, MOV holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $270M | $671M | $3.7B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $39M | $72M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | $27M | -$504M | -$78M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $53M | $491M | -$60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | +54.2% | +61.4% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | +4.4% | -1.8% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | +4.0% | -13.6% | -7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +8.0% | +13.2% | -6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +9.7% | -18.7% | -18.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +105.3% | +52.8% | +120.8% | +6.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VRA and FOSL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MOV's 11.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOSL's 12.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116M | $632M | $2.2B | $262M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168M | $459M | $5.2B | $448M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.42x | 23.57x | -1.87x | -3.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.32x | 13.36x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.70x | — | 12.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.94x | 0.50x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.22x | 5.94x | 2.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.49x | 11.83x | 14.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOV leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOV delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. MOV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOV scores 8/9 vs FOSL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.0% | +5.4% | -4.7% | -71.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.9% | +3.6% | -15.1% | -13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.8% | +6.3% | -13.6% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +4.8% | -17.0% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.11x | 8.34x | 3.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52M | -$172M | $2.9B | $186M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $231M | $166M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71M | $58M | $3.1B | $282M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.04x | 67.12x | — | 0.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOSL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOV five years ago would be worth $11,072 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,141 for CPRI. Over the past 12 months, FOSL leads with a +259.2% total return vs CPRI's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOSL at 12.5% vs CPRI's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.5% | +32.9% | -23.4% | +17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.2% | +98.5% | +18.4% | +259.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.3% | +26.6% | -50.5% | +42.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.5% | +10.7% | -68.6% | -63.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | +36.8% | -63.1% | -88.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.1% | +8.2% | -20.9% | +12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
VRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRA is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOSL's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRA currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs CPRI's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.38x | 2.03x | 2.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.39 | $29.24 | $28.27 | $5.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.39 | $14.18 | $15.37 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +94.3% | +66.1% | +78.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 58.5 | 47.3 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 143K | 2.5M | 730K |
Analyst Outlook
VRA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VRA as "Hold", MOV as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold", FOSL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 55.9% upside for FOSL (target: $7) vs 8.8% for MOV (target: $30). MOV is the only dividend payer here at 4.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.00 | $25.33 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 13 | 53 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.37 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
MOV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRA leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
VRA vs MOV vs CPRI vs FOSL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 5% for Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA). Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL?
On forward P/E, Capri Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 13.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL?
Over the past 5 years, Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) delivered a total return of +10. 7%, compared to -68. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOV returned +36. 8% versus FOSL's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vera Bradley, Inc.
(VRA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Fossil Group, Inc. 's 2. 46β — meaning FOSL is approximately 96% more volatile than VRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -27. 5% for Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Movado Group, Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Capri Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MOV leads at -3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL?
Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOV leads at 4. 4% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) trades at 13.
4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Movado Group, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOSL: 55. 9% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL?
In this comparison, MOV (5.
0% yield) pays a dividend. VRA, CPRI, FOSL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VRA or MOV or CPRI or FOSL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5. 0% yield). Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOV: +36. 8%, FOSL: -88. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRA and MOV and CPRI and FOSL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOSL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MOV pays a dividend while VRA, CPRI, FOSL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.