Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Software - Application
VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $693M | $5.53B | $157M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $94M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-361M | $14M | $-464M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 99.4% | 84.2% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.4% | 15.3% | — | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 36.5x | — | 75.2x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $3M | $98K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $212M | $44M | $714M | $10M |
VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viridian Therapeuti… (VRDN) | 100 | 114.6 | +14.6% |
| Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) | 100 | 268.0 | +168.0% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRDN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24
- Rev growth 233.6%, EPS growth 16.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 241.9%
- Beta 1.24, current ratio 12.65x
- 233.6% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0%
RDVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 7.18x
- Lower P/E (36.5x vs 75.2x)
- 15.0% margin vs VRDN's -5.1%
- 0.6% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs RDVT's 6.4%
IDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.41 vs IMVT's 1.37
- +193.2% vs RDVT's +21.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 233.6% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (36.5x vs 75.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs VRDN's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs IMVT's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +193.2% vs RDVT's +21.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs VRDN's -50.6%, ROIC 17.6% vs -47.3% |
VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RDVT leads in 3 of 6 categories
IDN leads 1 • VRDN leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDVT and IDN operate at a comparable scale, with $94M and $0 in trailing revenue. RDVT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRDN's -5.1%. On growth, VRDN holds the edge at +95.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $94M | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$386M | $23M | -$487M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$361M | $14M | -$464M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$304M | $28M | -$423M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.4% | +84.2% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +15.3% | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +15.0% | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +29.4% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.8% | +17.4% | — | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | +25.0% | +19.7% | -43.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RDVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RDVT's 27.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IDN's 72.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $693M | $5.5B | $157M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $652M | $4.8B | $148M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.11x | 53.95x | -9.97x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.50x | — | 75.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.38x | — | 72.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.32x | 7.68x | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.99x | 7.00x | 5.83x | 7.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.07x | — | 35.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDVT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RDVT delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-61 for VRDN. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRDN's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDVT scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.7% | +14.0% | -47.1% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.6% | +12.8% | -44.1% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.3% | +17.6% | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.7% | +13.7% | -66.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.03x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$162M | -$41M | -$714M | -$10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $212M | $44M | $714M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $3M | $98,000 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.68x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDVT five years ago would be worth $25,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,593 for IDN. Over the past 12 months, IDN leads with a +193.2% total return vs RDVT's +21.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDN at 51.7% vs VRDN's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.7% | -4.4% | +5.1% | +17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.1% | +21.3% | +96.1% | +193.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +199.9% | +40.9% | +249.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | +155.9% | +62.4% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +6.4% | +173.6% | +322.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +44.2% | +12.1% | +51.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and IDN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs VRDN's 49.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.17x | 1.37x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.29 | $64.14 | $30.09 | $9.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.76 | $33.62 | $13.36 | $2.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.5% | +76.5% | +90.5% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 64.8 | 60.2 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 118K | 1.4M | 384K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VRDN as "Buy", RDVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", IDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 151.4% upside for VRDN (target: $43) vs 9.4% for IDN (target: $9). RDVT is the only dividend payer here at 0.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.67 | $62.00 | $45.50 | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 1 | 23 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RDVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IDN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
VRDN vs RDVT vs IMVT vs IDN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
(VRDN) is the stronger pick with 233. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) offers the better valuation at 53. 9x trailing P/E (36. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. (VRDN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN?
On forward P/E, Red Violet, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 36. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN?
Over the past 5 years, Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) delivered a total return of +155. 9%, compared to -4. 1% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDN returned +322. 3% versus VRDN's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning IMVT is approximately 234% more volatile than IDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
(VRDN) is pulling ahead at 233. 6% versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellicheck, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRDN leads at 241. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN?
Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 6% net margin versus -483. 6% for Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDVT leads at 14. 6% versus -512. 9% for VRDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRDN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) trades at 36. 5x forward P/E versus 75. 2x for Intellicheck, Inc. — 38. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRDN: 151. 4% to $42. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN?
In this comparison, RDVT (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. VRDN, IMVT, IDN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VRDN or RDVT or IMVT or IDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +322. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDN: +322. 3%, VRDN: -87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRDN and RDVT and IMVT and IDN?
These companies operate in different sectors (VRDN (Healthcare) and RDVT (Technology) and IMVT (Healthcare) and IDN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VRDN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RDVT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RDVT pays a dividend while VRDN, IMVT, IDN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.