VRME
VerifyMe, Inc.
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-85.7%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$2.23B
5Y Perf.+215.3%
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$11.28B
5Y Perf.+474.8%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$4.88B
5Y Perf.+490.9%
VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VRME | COHU | FORM | ACLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $9M | $2.23B | $11.28B | $4.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $481M | $840M | $845M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-56M | $68M | $101M |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 25.7% | 42.1% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | -10.6% | 12.7% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 89.2x | 66.5x | 43.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $359M | $45M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $227M | $103M | $145M |
VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VRME
COHU
FORM
ACLS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VerifyMe, Inc. (VRME) | 100 | 14.3 | -85.7% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 574.8 | +474.8% |
| Axcelis Technologie… (ACLS) | 100 | 590.9 | +490.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ACLS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cohu, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. FORM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VRME
VerifyMe, Inc.
The Secondary Option
VRME lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Growth Play
COHU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.7%
- 12.7% revenue growth vs ACLS's -17.6%
Best for: growth exposure
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 19.5% 10Y total return vs ACLS's 15.1%
- +387.8% vs VRME's +10.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
ACLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.00
- Lower volatility, beta 2.00, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 4.77x
- Beta 2.00, current ratio 4.77x
- Lower P/E (43.5x vs 66.5x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COHU | 12.7% revenue growth vs ACLS's -17.6% |
| Value | ACLS | Lower P/E (43.5x vs 66.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | ACLS | 11.9% margin vs VRME's -21.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ACLS | Beta 2.00 vs VRME's 2.16, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FORM | +387.8% vs VRME's +10.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ACLS | 7.5% ROA vs VRME's -29.7%, ROIC 9.6% vs -14.1% |
VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2014
FY 2025
FY 2025
VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLVRMELAGGINGCOHU
Who Leads Where
VRME leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACLS leads 1 • FORM leads 1 • COHU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓COHUCohu, Inc.
0leads
ACLSAxcelis Technologies,…
1leads
FORMFormFactor, Inc.
1leads
VRMEVerifyMe, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FORMvs ACLSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
VRME3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ACLS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FORM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
VRME1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FORM and ACLS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $845M annually — 39.0x VRME's $22M. ACLS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRME's -21.8%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VRMEVerifyMe, Inc. | COHUCohu, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. | ACLSAxcelis Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $481M | $840M | $845M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$514,000 | -$11M | $152M | $111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$56M | $68M | $101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $615,000 | $32M | -$5M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +25.7% | +42.1% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | -10.6% | +12.7% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -11.5% | +8.1% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +6.6% | -0.6% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +29.3% | +32.0% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.0% | +60.6% | +2.2% | -65.9% |
Evenly matched — FORM and ACLS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
VRME leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 41.8x trailing earnings, ACLS trades at a 80% valuation discount to FORM's 209.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACLS's 34.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 100.9x.
| Metric | VRMEVerifyMe, Inc. | COHUCohu, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. | ACLSAxcelis Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $2.2B | $11.3B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $2.4B | $11.2B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.09x | -29.86x | 209.68x | 41.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 89.21x | 66.48x | 43.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 100.94x | 34.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 4.93x | 14.37x | 5.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 2.82x | 10.94x | 4.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.20x | 207.83x | 960.69x | 45.56x |
VRME leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACLS delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-37 for VRME. ACLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRME scores 6/9 vs FORM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | VRMEVerifyMe, Inc. | COHUCohu, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. | ACLSAxcelis Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.5% | -6.8% | +6.7% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.7% | -4.9% | +5.6% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.1% | -5.7% | +5.4% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.2% | -5.9% | +6.1% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.46x | 0.04x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$601,000 | $132M | -$58M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $227M | $103M | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $359M | $45M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.63x | -168.82x | 252.69x | 77.10x |
ACLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLS five years ago would be worth $38,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,889 for VRME. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +387.8% total return vs VRME's +10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 72.9% vs VRME's -25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VRMEVerifyMe, Inc. | COHUCohu, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. | ACLSAxcelis Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +92.9% | +144.4% | +84.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.7% | +199.7% | +387.8% | +173.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.5% | +40.7% | +417.3% | +32.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +22.2% | +273.9% | +286.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +330.2% | +1952.2% | +1505.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.4% | +12.1% | +72.9% | +9.7% |
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COHU and ACLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLS is the less volatile stock with a 2.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VRME's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs VRME's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VRMEVerifyMe, Inc. | COHUCohu, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. | ACLSAxcelis Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 2.13x | 2.02x | 2.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.51 | $50.68 | $159.09 | $171.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $15.34 | $26.08 | $55.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.2% | +93.7% | +90.9% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 75.5 | 66.5 | 84.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 953K | 1.6M | 734K |
Evenly matched — COHU and ACLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
VRME leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COHU as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", ACLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -19.3% for ACLS (target: $128).
| Metric | VRMEVerifyMe, Inc. | COHUCohu, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. | ACLSAxcelis Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.75 | $123.38 | $128.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 19 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% | +0.2% | +2.5% |
VRME leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
VRME leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ACLS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallVerifyMe, Inc. (VRME)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VRME vs COHU vs FORM vs ACLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) offers the better valuation at 41. 8x trailing P/E (43. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cohu, Inc. (COHU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS?
On trailing P/E, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the cheapest at 41. 8x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 209. 7x. On forward P/E, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 43. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS?
Over the past 5 years, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) delivered a total return of +286. 8%, compared to -81. 1% for VerifyMe, Inc. (VRME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus VRME's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 00β versus VerifyMe, Inc. 's 2. 16β — meaning VRME is approximately 8% more volatile than ACLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -17. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VerifyMe, Inc. grew EPS -5. 7% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRME leads at 203. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS?
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACLS leads at 14. 2% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) trades at 43. 5x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 45. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VRME or COHU or FORM or ACLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1952% 10Y return). VerifyMe, Inc. (VRME) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORM: +1952%, VRME: -94. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRME and COHU and FORM and ACLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (VRME (Industrials) and COHU (Technology) and FORM (Technology) and ACLS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(VRME: -7.4% · COHU: 29.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.