Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Security & Protection Services
VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $9M | $2.23B | $3M | $13M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $481M | $4M | $0.00 | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-56M | $-12M | $-12M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 25.7% | 60.0% | — | 25.2% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | -10.6% | -183.3% | — | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 89.2x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $359M | $4M | $138K | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $227M | $3M | $3M | $454K |
VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VerifyMe, Inc. (VRME) | 100 | 56.0 | -44.0% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
| T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| Intensity Therapeut… (INTS) | 100 | 3.4 | -96.6% |
| Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.16
- Better valuation composite
COHU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 330.2% 10Y total return vs VRME's -94.8%
- 12.7% revenue growth vs INTS's -74.2%
- +199.7% vs DGLY's -73.9%
- -4.9% ROA vs INTS's -214.6%, ROIC -5.7% vs -475.7%
IDAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.87, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.92x
- Beta 1.87, current ratio 1.92x
- 6.6% margin vs IDAI's -316.4%
- Beta 1.87 vs DGLY's 3.58
DGLY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -30.4%, EPS growth 39.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs INTS's -74.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs IDAI's -316.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.87 vs DGLY's 3.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.7% vs DGLY's -73.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.9% ROA vs INTS's -214.6%, ROIC -5.7% vs -475.7% |
VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRME leads in 2 of 6 categories
COHU leads 2 • IDAI leads 0 • INTS leads 0 • DGLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — COHU and IDAI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COHU and INTS operate at a comparable scale, with $481M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -11.5% (COHU) to -3.2% (IDAI). On growth, IDAI holds the edge at +70.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $481M | $4M | $0 | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$514,000 | -$11M | -$6M | -$9M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$56M | -$12M | -$12M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $615,000 | $32M | -$8M | -$10M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +25.7% | +60.0% | — | +25.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | -10.6% | -183.3% | — | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -11.5% | -3.2% | — | -59.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +6.6% | -2.2% | — | -57.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +29.3% | +70.7% | — | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.0% | +60.6% | +32.1% | +75.2% | -84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
VRME leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $2.2B | $3M | $13M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $2.4B | $4M | $11M | $11M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.09x | -29.86x | -0.22x | -0.17x | -0.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 89.21x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 4.93x | 0.89x | — | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 2.82x | 0.86x | 0.97x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.20x | 207.83x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
COHU leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COHU delivers a -6.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-4 for INTS. INTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDAI's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRME scores 6/9 vs INTS's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.5% | -6.8% | -189.5% | -3.7% | -136.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.7% | -4.9% | -105.4% | -2.1% | -42.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.1% | -5.7% | -2.2% | -4.8% | -114.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.2% | -5.9% | -194.9% | -2.0% | -135.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.46x | 1.30x | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$601,000 | $132M | $1M | -$2M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $227M | $3M | $3M | $454,314 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $359M | $4M | $138,000 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.63x | -168.82x | -22.08x | — | -3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COHU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COHU five years ago would be worth $12,218 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for DGLY. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +199.7% total return vs DGLY's -73.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COHU at 12.1% vs DGLY's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +92.9% | -38.4% | -49.8% | +93.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.7% | +199.7% | +20.9% | -62.9% | -73.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.5% | +40.7% | -87.5% | -96.6% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +22.2% | -99.1% | -96.6% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +330.2% | +102.4% | -96.6% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.4% | +12.1% | -50.0% | -67.5% | -94.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COHU and INTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DGLY's 3.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs DGLY's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 2.13x | 1.99x | 1.87x | 3.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.51 | $50.68 | $5.28 | $43.50 | $15.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $15.34 | $1.80 | $0.40 | $0.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.2% | +93.7% | +47.2% | +11.7% | +8.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 75.5 | 49.1 | 36.9 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 953K | 43K | 32K | 161K |
Analyst Outlook
VRME leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COHU as "Buy", INTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -2.2% for INTS (target: $5).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.75 | — | $5.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | — | 3 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% | +2.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VRME leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). COHU leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
VRME vs COHU vs IDAI vs INTS vs DGLY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 4% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). Analysts rate Cohu, Inc. (COHU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY?
Over the past 5 years, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) delivered a total return of +22. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COHU returned +330. 2% versus DGLY's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.
(INTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 87β versus Digital Ally, Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning DGLY is approximately 91% more volatile than INTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 130% for T Stamp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -32. 4% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Ally, Inc. grew EPS 39. 5% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Cohu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRME leads at 203. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY?
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.
(INTS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -344. 1% for T Stamp Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INTS leads at 0. 0% versus -303. 9% for IDAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDAI leads at 65. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4.
8% to $49. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VRME or COHU or IDAI or INTS or DGLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+330. 2% 10Y return). Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COHU: +330. 2%, DGLY: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VRME and COHU and IDAI and INTS and DGLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (VRME (Industrials) and COHU (Technology) and IDAI (Technology) and INTS (Healthcare) and DGLY (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.