Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.37B | $67.18B | $2.47B | $138.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $660M | $3.67B | $1.02B | $9.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-137M | $136M | $-12M | $1.28B |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 79.9% | 78.2% | 73.5% |
| Operating Margin | -21.9% | -0.7% | 2.9% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 242.2x | 88.0x | 11.1x | 53.3x |
| Total Debt | $572M | $1.54B | $466M | $338M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $401M | $188M | $2.27B |
VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 102.0 | +2.0% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Palo Alto Networks,… (PANW) | 100 | 501.2 | +401.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VRNS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.95
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 95.5%, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.95 vs DDOG's 1.40
DDOG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.7%, EPS growth -41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs TENB's 11.0%
- +78.0% vs VRNS's -36.7%
TENB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.1x vs 53.3x)
PANW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 402.6%
- 13.0% margin vs VRNS's -20.7%
- 5.1% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 17.1% vs -11.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs TENB's 11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 53.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs VRNS's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs DDOG's 1.40 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.0% vs VRNS's -36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 17.1% vs -11.0% |
VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TENB leads in 1 of 6 categories
PANW leads 1 • DDOG leads 1 • VRNS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DDOG and PANW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PANW is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 15.0x VRNS's $660M. PANW is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRNS's -20.7%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $660M | $3.7B | $1.0B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$135M | $73M | $72M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$137M | $136M | -$12M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $120M | $1.1B | $263M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +79.9% | +78.2% | +73.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.9% | -0.7% | +2.9% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.7% | +3.7% | -1.2% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +29.4% | +25.7% | +41.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.9% | +32.2% | +9.6% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +120.9% | +106.3% | +57.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TENB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 122.8x trailing earnings, PANW trades at a 80% valuation discount to DDOG's 629.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TENB's 63.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 874.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $67.2B | $2.5B | $138.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $68.3B | $2.7B | $136.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.38x | 629.10x | -71.80x | 122.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 242.23x | 87.97x | 11.06x | 53.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 874.03x | 63.60x | 85.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.40x | 19.60x | 2.47x | 14.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.19x | 18.38x | 7.93x | 17.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.99x | 67.14x | 9.69x | 39.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PANW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PANW delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. PANW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TENB's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDOG scores 6/9 vs PANW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.4% | +3.8% | -3.7% | +13.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | +2.1% | -0.7% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | -0.8% | +0.2% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.0% | -1.0% | +0.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.41x | 1.43x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $369M | $1.1B | $278M | -$1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $401M | $188M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $572M | $1.5B | $466M | $338M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.01x | 4.03x | 1.02x | 1559.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PANW five years ago would be worth $34,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,806 for TENB. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +78.0% total return vs VRNS's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 33.9% vs TENB's -16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | +41.1% | -5.2% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.7% | +78.0% | -31.2% | +4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | +140.3% | -41.1% | +105.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.9% | +144.2% | -41.9% | +244.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +317.5% | +402.6% | -28.8% | +746.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +33.9% | -16.2% | +27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRNS and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRNS is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDOG's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.40x | 1.12x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.90 | $201.69 | $35.69 | $223.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.70 | $98.01 | $15.73 | $139.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.9% | +93.6% | +60.4% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.1 | 66.5 | 60.1 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 5.0M | 3.0M | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VRNS as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", TENB as "Buy", PANW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.7% upside for TENB (target: $28) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $174.63 | $27.94 | $207.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 47 | 28 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | 0.0% | +10.0% | 0.0% |
TENB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PANW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
VRNS vs DDOG vs TENB vs PANW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 0% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) offers the better valuation at 122. 8x trailing P/E (53. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW?
On trailing P/E, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) is the cheapest at 122. 8x versus Datadog, Inc. at 629. 1x. On forward P/E, Tenable Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW?
Over the past 5 years, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) delivered a total return of +244. 4%, compared to -41. 9% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PANW returned +746. 7% versus TENB's -28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Varonis Systems, Inc.
(VRNS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Datadog, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning DDOG is approximately 48% more volatile than VRNS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 143% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 11. 0% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tenable Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 3. 2% year-over-year, compared to -56. 0% for Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -20. 7% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PANW leads at 13. 5% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 231. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TENB: 29. 7% to $27. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VRNS or DDOG or TENB or PANW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +746. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PANW: +746. 7%, TENB: -28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VRNS and DDOG and TENB and PANW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PANW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.