VSAT vs RTX

For growth investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger pick with 9.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +122.

7%, compared to +34. 1% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +231. 2% versus VSAT's -11. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Viasat, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning VSAT is approximately 473% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 162% for Viasat, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RTX Corporation (RTX) is pulling ahead at 9.

7% versus 5. 5% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viasat, Inc. grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to 39. 7% for RTX Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSAT leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RTX Corporation (RTX) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

6% net margin versus -12. 7% for Viasat, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RTX leads at 10. 0% versus -2. 2% for VSAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VSAT leads at 33. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27.

2% to $224. 89.

In this comparison, RTX (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. VSAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 1. 5% yield, +231. 2% 10Y return). Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +231. 2%, VSAT: -11. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (VSAT (Technology) and RTX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

RTX pays a dividend while VSAT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.