Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $273M | $77M | $6.20B | $4.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $151M | $827M | $634M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-194M | $-195M | $-187M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | 83.7% | 96.0% | 77.8% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | -344.6% | -55.7% | -8.2% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 115.7x | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $77M | $234M | $492M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $61M | $985M | $214M |
VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Karyopharm Therapeu… (KPTI) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 95.9 | -4.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSTM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 209.1%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 128.4%
- 209.1% revenue growth vs KPTI's 0.6%
KPTI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 147.3%
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.50
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.50, current ratio 2.84x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 209.1% revenue growth vs KPTI's 0.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.3% margin vs VSTM's -391.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs VSTM's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.0% vs VSTM's -34.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs KPTI's -176.9% |
VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOLD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • VSTM leads 0 • KPTI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTCT is the larger business by revenue, generating $827M annually — 16.7x VSTM's $50M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.3% (FOLD) to -3.9% (VSTM). On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $151M | $827M | $634M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$170M | -$84M | -$21M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$194M | -$195M | -$187M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | -$59M | -$229M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.7% | +96.0% | +77.8% | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -55.7% | -8.2% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -129.0% | -22.6% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -39.1% | -27.7% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.8% | -76.8% | +23.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.5% | +55.2% | -100.3% | -89.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and FOLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $273M | $77M | $6.2B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $145M | $250M | $5.7B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.30x | -0.50x | 9.60x | -164.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 115.72x | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 6.37x | 114.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.83x | 0.53x | 3.58x | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.77x | — | — | 16.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.82x | 152.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PTCT and FOLD each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD delivers a -12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VSTM. VSTM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs KPTI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.9% | — | — | -12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -91.6% | -176.9% | -6.8% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | — | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.0% | -2.0% | +55.9% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | — | — | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$128M | $173M | -$492M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $61M | $985M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $234M | $492M | $483M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -208.73x | -3.48x | -1.00x | 1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $17,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for KPTI. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +136.0% total return vs VSTM's -34.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTCT at 19.9% vs KPTI's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.5% | +25.2% | -2.6% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.0% | +105.0% | +47.0% | +136.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | -71.7% | +72.3% | +11.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | -94.2% | +73.9% | +36.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | -92.8% | +989.1% | +147.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.4% | -34.3% | +19.9% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSTM's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs VSTM's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.50x | 0.91x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.25 | $10.99 | $87.50 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.55 | $3.65 | $43.18 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.0% | +81.9% | +85.4% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 54.9 | 56.6 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 442K | 1.2M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VSTM as "Buy", KPTI as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 363.2% upside for VSTM (target: $18) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $14.17 | $95.83 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 20 | 26 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FOLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). PTCT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VSTM vs KPTI vs PTCT vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verastem, Inc.
(VSTM) is the stronger pick with 209. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (KPTI). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (115. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD?
On forward P/E, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 40. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to -94. 2% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (KPTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +989. 1% versus KPTI's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Verastem, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning VSTM is approximately 228% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verastem, Inc.
(VSTM) is pulling ahead at 209. 1% versus 0. 6% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (KPTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -90. 5% for Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSTM leads at 128. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -677. 6% for Verastem, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -550. 3% for VSTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KPTI leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) trades at 40. 6x forward P/E versus 115. 7x for PTC Therapeutics, Inc. — 75. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSTM: 363. 2% to $18. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is VSTM or KPTI or PTCT or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), +989. 1% 10Y return). Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +989. 1%, VSTM: -76. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSTM and KPTI and PTCT and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; KPTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.