Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WAB vs ALSN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

Railroads

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$45.09B
5Y Perf.+335.1%
ALSN
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.23B
5Y Perf.+229.2%

WAB vs ALSN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WAB logoWAB
ALSN logoALSN
IndustryRailroadsAuto - Parts
Market Cap$45.09B$10.23B
Revenue (TTM)$11.51B$3.65B
Net Income (TTM)$1.21B$543M
Gross Margin33.8%40.8%
Operating Margin16.1%24.1%
Forward P/E25.0x14.1x
Total Debt$5.54B$2.92B
Cash & Equiv.$789M$1.50B

WAB vs ALSNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WAB
ALSN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB)100435.1+335.1%
Allison Transmissio… (ALSN)100329.2+229.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WAB vs ALSN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ALSN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
The Growth Play

WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
  • 7.5% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7%
  • +40.6% vs ALSN's +27.7%
Best for: growth exposure
ALSN
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

ALSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.9%
  • 373.8% 10Y total return vs WAB's 247.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 4.85x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWAB logoWAB7.5% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7%
ValueALSN logoALSNLower P/E (14.1x vs 25.0x), PEG 0.62 vs 0.97
Quality / MarginsALSN logoALSN14.9% margin vs WAB's 10.5%
Stability / SafetyALSN logoALSNBeta 1.11 vs WAB's 1.11
DividendsALSN logoALSN0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%
Momentum (1Y)WAB logoWAB+40.6% vs ALSN's +27.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ALSN logoALSN8.4% ROA vs WAB's 5.6%, ROIC 22.2% vs 9.6%

WAB vs ALSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
FY 2025
Freight Segment
72.0%$8.0B
Transit Segment
28.0%$3.1B
ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Parts Support Equipment And Other
70.7%$643M
Defense
29.3%$267M

WAB vs ALSN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALSNLAGGINGWAB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

WAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 3.2x ALSN's $3.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.9% (ALSN) to 10.5% (WAB). On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …ALSN logoALSNAllison Transmiss…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11.5B$3.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.3B$970M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.2B$543M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.6B$713M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.8%+40.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.1%+24.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.5%+14.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.3%+19.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.0%+83.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.8%-40.4%
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.8x trailing earnings, ALSN trades at a 57% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALSN offers better value at 0.73x vs WAB's 1.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …ALSN logoALSNAllison Transmiss…
Market CapShares × price$45.1B$10.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$49.8B$11.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS38.90x16.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.05x14.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.51x0.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.03x10.63x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.04x3.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.06x5.60x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.08x15.77x
ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALSN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $11 for WAB. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALSN scores 6/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …ALSN logoALSNAllison Transmiss…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.9%+29.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.6%+8.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.6%+22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.7%+18.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.50x1.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4.8B$1.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$789M$1.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.5B$2.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.41x64.20x
ALSN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,345 for ALSN. Over the past 12 months, WAB leads with a +40.6% total return vs ALSN's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAB at 39.3% vs ALSN's 37.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …ALSN logoALSNAllison Transmiss…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.0%+24.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+40.6%+27.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+170.1%+162.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+229.0%+183.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+247.1%+373.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+39.3%+37.9%
WAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WAB and ALSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ALSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAB currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ALSN's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …ALSN logoALSNAllison Transmiss…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.11x1.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$275.84$137.42
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$184.26$76.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.3%+89.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.750.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded905K814K
Evenly matched — WAB and ALSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALSN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates WAB as "Buy" and ALSN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for WAB (target: $291) vs -5.8% for ALSN (target: $116). For income investors, ALSN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.87% vs WAB's 0.38%.

MetricWAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …ALSN logoALSNAllison Transmiss…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$291.00$116.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3429
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises66
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.01$1.07
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+3.2%
ALSN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ALSN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallAllison Transmission Holdin… (ALSN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WAB vs ALSN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WAB or ALSN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WAB or ALSN?

On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WAB or ALSN?

Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.

0%, compared to +183. 5% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +377. 7% versus WAB's +247. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WAB or ALSN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 3% more volatile than ALSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WAB or ALSN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WAB or ALSN?

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 10. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 16. 7% for WAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WAB or ALSN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAB: 9. 5% to $291. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WAB or ALSN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the highest yield at 0. 9%, versus 0. 4% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).

09

Is WAB or ALSN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 0. 9% yield, +377. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +377. 7%, WAB: +247. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WAB and ALSN?

These companies operate in different sectors (WAB (Industrials) and ALSN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ALSN pays a dividend while WAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WAB

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALSN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 41%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WAB and ALSN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WAB: 13.0% · ALSN: 83.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(WAB: 10.5% · ALSN: 14.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WAB: 38.9x · ALSN: 16.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.