WAB vs RXO vs TT vs CHRW vs CARR

For growth investors, RXO, Inc.

(RXO) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the cheapest at 35. 5x versus Carrier Global Corporation at 39. 3x. On forward P/E, Carrier Global Corporation is actually cheaper at 23. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation wins at 0. 97x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +233.

1%, compared to +3. 6% for RXO, Inc. (RXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TT returned +867. 6% versus RXO's +3. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus RXO, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning RXO is approximately 174% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 90% for Carrier Global Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RXO, Inc.

(RXO) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RXO, Inc. grew EPS 72. 8% year-over-year, compared to -72. 4% for Carrier Global Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

7% net margin versus -1. 7% for RXO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TT leads at 18. 6% versus -0. 1% for RXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TT leads at 36. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) trades at 23. 9x forward P/E versus 1250. 0x for RXO, Inc. — 1226. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TT: 12. 1% to $522. 73.

In this comparison, CHRW (1.

4% yield), CARR (1. 4% yield), TT (0. 8% yield), WAB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RXO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

98), 0. 8% yield, +867. 6% 10Y return). RXO, Inc. (RXO) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TT: +867. 6%, RXO: +3. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CHRW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CARR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TT, CHRW, CARR pay a dividend while WAB, RXO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.