Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WAVE
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.+0.9%
CWCO
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$529M
5Y Perf.+161.7%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-54.0%
AMRC
Ameresco, Inc.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.-56.7%
GPRE
Green Plains Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.15B
5Y Perf.-53.5%

WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WAVE logoWAVE
CWCO logoCWCO
MARA logoMARA
AMRC logoAMRC
GPRE logoGPRE
IndustryRenewable UtilitiesRegulated WaterFinancial - Capital MarketsEngineering & ConstructionChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$48M$529M$4.83B$1.57B$1.15B
Revenue (TTM)$168K$132M$907M$1.98B$1.94B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$18M$-1.31B$31M$-15M
Gross Margin75.0%36.6%-47.7%15.6%1.8%
Operating Margin-15.3%139015.1%-90.6%6.3%1.2%
Forward P/E31.6x25.0x46.6x
Total Debt$1M$708.60B$3.65B$1.95B$508M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$123.79T$547M$72M$182M

WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WAVE
CWCO
MARA
AMRC
GPRE
StockJul 21May 26Return
Eco Wave Power Glob… (WAVE)100100.9+0.9%
Consolidated Water … (CWCO)100261.7+161.7%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10046.0-54.0%
Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC)10043.3-56.7%
Green Plains Inc. (GPRE)10046.5-53.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CWCO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ameresco, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MARA and GPRE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WAVE
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)
The Utilities Pick

Among these 5 stocks, WAVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: utilities exposure
CWCO
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.
The Income Pick

CWCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
  • Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
  • 13.9% margin vs WAVE's -17.6%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3%
Best for: growth
AMRC
Ameresco, Inc.
The Growth Play

AMRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth -22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
  • 5.4% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 155.1%
  • Lower P/E (25.0x vs 46.6x)
  • 0.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -205.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GPRE
Green Plains Inc.
The Momentum Pick

GPRE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +336.6% vs MARA's -4.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMARA logoMARA38.2% NII/revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3%
ValueAMRC logoAMRCLower P/E (25.0x vs 46.6x)
Quality / MarginsCWCO logoCWCO13.9% margin vs WAVE's -17.6%
Stability / SafetyCWCO logoCWCOBeta 0.76 vs MARA's 3.11, lower leverage
DividendsCWCO logoCWCO100.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GPRE logoGPRE+336.6% vs MARA's -4.7%
Efficiency (ROA)AMRC logoAMRC0.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -205.2%

WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WAVEEco Wave Power Global AB (publ)

Segment breakdown not available.

CWCOConsolidated Water Co. Ltd.
FY 2025
Services
35.1%$46M
Retail
25.4%$34M
Bulk
25.4%$33M
Manufacturing Units
14.2%$19M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
AMRCAmeresco, Inc.
FY 2024
Project Revenue
75.6%$1.3B
Energy Assets Revenue
12.1%$213M
Other Revenue
6.3%$111M
Operations And Maintenance Revenue
6.0%$106M
GPREGreen Plains Inc.
FY 2025
Products And Services Other
101.2%$94M
Intersegment Revenues
-1.2%$-1,119,000

WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCWCOLAGGINGGPRE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 11790.2x WAVE's $168,000. CWCO is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAVE's -17.6%. On growth, AMRC holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWAVE logoWAVEEco Wave Power Gl…CWCO logoCWCOConsolidated Wate…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$168,000$132M$907M$2.0B$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$25.98T$627M$204M$122M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3M$18M-$1.3B$31M-$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$33.67T-$312M-$251M$90M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.0%+36.6%-47.7%+15.6%+1.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.3%+139015.1%-90.6%+6.3%+1.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.6%+13.9%-144.6%+1.6%-0.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-86.2%+254916.5%-34.4%-12.7%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.4%+13.8%-25.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-177.8%-11.5%-4.8%-2.5%+134.2%
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AMRC's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 103.8x.

MetricWAVE logoWAVEEco Wave Power Gl…CWCO logoCWCOConsolidated Wate…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.
Market CapShares × price$48M$529M$4.8B$1.6B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$43M-$123.08T$7.9B$3.4B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-12.83x-3.44x35.76x-9.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.60x25.04x46.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-4.74x15.00x103.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1254.97x4.01x5.32x0.81x0.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.74x0.00x1.30x1.41x1.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.00x17.84x
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMRC delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-41 for WAVE. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWCO scores 5/9 vs WAVE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWAVE logoWAVEEco Wave Power Gl…CWCO logoCWCOConsolidated Wate…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-40.9%0.0%-30.5%+2.9%-2.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-30.7%0.0%-17.1%+0.7%-1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.1%+26.6%-9.0%+3.3%-5.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-46.1%+16.0%-12.1%+3.7%-6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–915344
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.24x0.00x1.05x1.73x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$123.08T$3.1B$1.9B$326M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$123.79T$547M$72M$182M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$708.6B$3.6B$1.9B$508M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-48.45x4.73x1.20x-0.08x
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — WAVE and GPRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +336.6% total return vs MARA's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAVE at 45.4% vs GPRE's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWAVE logoWAVEEco Wave Power Gl…CWCO logoCWCOConsolidated Wate…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+36.4%-3.9%+28.2%-3.2%+60.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.0%+47.9%-4.7%+134.3%+336.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+207.5%+101.4%+36.1%-29.9%-46.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.3%+197.4%-59.5%-44.0%-48.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.3%+155.1%-51.6%+542.4%+21.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+45.4%+26.3%+10.8%-11.2%-19.0%
Evenly matched — WAVE and GPRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CWCO and GPRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CWCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MARA's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRE currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs MARA's 54.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWAVE logoWAVEEco Wave Power Gl…CWCO logoCWCOConsolidated Wate…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.25x0.76x3.11x2.03x1.22x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.87$39.12$23.45$44.93$18.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.41$22.69$6.66$12.37$3.39
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.2%+84.8%+54.2%+66.1%+86.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.547.969.668.054.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded15K163K47.6M507K1.5M
Evenly matched — CWCO and GPRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CWCO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy", GPRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for AMRC (target: $43) vs -16.2% for GPRE (target: $14). CWCO is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWAVE logoWAVEEco Wave Power Gl…CWCO logoCWCOConsolidated Wate…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.13$43.17$13.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts6192320
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$497756.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+1.0%0.0%+2.6%
CWCO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CWCO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallConsolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WAVE vs CWCO vs MARA vs AMRC vs GPRE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE?

On forward P/E, Ameresco, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE?

Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.

Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus WAVE's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Water Co.

Ltd. (CWCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning MARA is approximately 309% more volatile than CWCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ameresco, Inc. grew EPS -22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAVE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE?

Consolidated Water Co.

Ltd. (CWCO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus -97. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus -84. 2% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWCO leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 46. 6x for Green Plains Inc. — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRC: 45. 5% to $43. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE?

In this comparison, CWCO (100.

0% yield) pays a dividend. WAVE, MARA, AMRC, GPRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WAVE or CWCO or MARA or AMRC or GPRE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Water Co.

Ltd. (CWCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 100. 0% yield, +155. 1% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWCO: +155. 1%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WAVE and CWCO and MARA and AMRC and GPRE?

These companies operate in different sectors (WAVE (Utilities) and CWCO (Utilities) and MARA (Financial Services) and AMRC (Industrials) and GPRE (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WAVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CWCO pays a dividend while WAVE, MARA, AMRC, GPRE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WAVE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GPRE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WAVE and CWCO and MARA and AMRC and GPRE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WAVE: -77.3% · CWCO: 4.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.