Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WB vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
WB vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.76B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $372M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 78.2% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.91B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.89B | $9.03B |
WB vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 27.5 | -72.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WB vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 53.2%, current ratio 3.61x
- Lower P/E (5.2x vs 24.8x)
- 8.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs WB's -46.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.2x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WB's 21.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs WB's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WB's 5.7%, ROIC 29.8% vs 10.3% |
WB vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WB vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 25.6x WB's $1.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 24.3% (NFLX) to 21.1% (WB). On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $535M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $372M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.2% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WB trades at a 79% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WB's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.29x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.22x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.37x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.30x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for WB. WB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,413 for WB. Over the past 12 months, WB leads with a +7.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs WB's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.9% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.10 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.3% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WB as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.1% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 31.8% for NFLX (target: $116). WB is the only dividend payer here at 8.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.18 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
WB vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WB or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weibo Corporation (WB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WB or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Weibo Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WB or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -75. 9% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus WB's -46. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WB or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Weibo Corporation's 0. 93β — meaning WB is approximately 138% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Weibo Corporation (WB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WB or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -18. 9% for Weibo Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WB or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 17. 1% for Weibo Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 28. 2% for WB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WB leads at 78. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WB or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weibo Corporation (WB) trades at 5.
2x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 103. 1% to $17. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — WB or NFLX?
In this comparison, WB (8.
7% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WB or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, WB: -46. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WB and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. WB pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.