Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WBD vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
WBD vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $68.18B | $96.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.30B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $727M | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 93.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $32.57B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.57B | $9.48B |
WBD vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.1 | +25.1% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBD vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -5.1%, EPS growth 106.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 87.6%, current ratio 1.06x
- +222.7% vs CMCSA's -19.5%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- 16.0% 10Y total return vs WBD's -3.8%
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.0% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 93.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs WBD's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +222.7% vs CMCSA's -19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs WBD's 0.7%, ROIC 8.2% vs 1.5% |
WBD vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBD vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 3.4x WBD's $37.3B. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's 1.9%. On growth, CMCSA holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.3B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13.4B | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $727M | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.1B | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 95% valuation discount to WBD's 93.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMCSA's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68.2B | $96.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96.2B | $197.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 93.79x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.75x | 5.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.83x | 0.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.85x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.08x | 4.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $2 for WBD. WBD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMCSA scores 7/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28.0B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.6B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32.6B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WBD five years ago would be worth $7,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,626 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +222.7% total return vs CMCSA's -19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.4% vs CMCSA's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.6% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +222.7% | -19.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.1% | -25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | -43.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.8% | +16.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | -9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBD and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs CMCSA's 72.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.00 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.06 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +72.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22.4M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WBD as "Hold" and CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for CMCSA (target: $32) vs 10.1% for WBD (target: $30). CMCSA is the only dividend payer here at 5.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.94 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.4% |
CMCSA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WBD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
WBD vs CMCSA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBD or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger pick with -0.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBD or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBD or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) delivered a total return of -25. 0%, compared to -43. 7% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMCSA returned +16. 0% versus WBD's -3. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBD or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 331% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBD or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is pulling ahead at -0.
0% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to 30. 2% for Comcast Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBD or CMCSA?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMCSA leads at 16. 7% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBD or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMCSA: 20.
5% to $31. 87.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBD or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield) pays a dividend. WBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBD or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +16. 0%, WBD: -3. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBD and CMCSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CMCSA pays a dividend while WBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.