WBI
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
Oil & Gas Energy
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+3.9%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisWBI
COP
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WBI vs COP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
COP
ConocoPhillips
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$140.61B
5Y Perf.+14.0%
WBI vs COP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  WBI |  COP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $140.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $58.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $7.32B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 58.8x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $23.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $6.50B |
Quick Verdict: WBI vs COP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: COP leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇COP emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
WBI
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC
The Defensive Pick
WBI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 1.38x
- current ratio 1.38x
- Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 36.4%)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
COP
ConocoPhillips
The Income Pick
COP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 2.8%
- 220.0% 10Y total return vs WBI's 21.5%
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 58.8x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value |  COP | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 58.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | COP | 12.6% margin vs WBI's 2.9% |
| Stability / Safety |  WBI | Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 36.4%) |
| Dividends | COP | 2.8% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COP | +27.1% vs WBI's +21.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | COP | 6.0% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 3.3% |
WBI vs COP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
WBI vs COP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCOPLAGGINGWBI
WBIWaterBridge Infrastru…
2leads
COPConocoPhillips
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WBIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
COP4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WBI3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
COP5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
COP5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WBI1/1
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
COP1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.3B annually — 106.3x WBI's $548M. COP is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBI's 2.9%. On growth, WBI holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WBIWaterBridge Infra… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $58.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $22.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $18.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +29.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -20.2% |
COP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COP's 6.8x.
| Metric | WBIWaterBridge Infra… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $140.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $157.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -305.00x | 18.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.76x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 2.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.38x |
WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COP delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COP's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs COP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WBIWaterBridge Infra… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | $16.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $23.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 9.42x |
COP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COP five years ago would be worth $22,316 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, COP leads with a +27.1% total return vs WBI's +21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COP at 6.9% vs WBI's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WBIWaterBridge Infra… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +123.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +220.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +6.9% |
COP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WBI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
WBI currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs COP's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WBIWaterBridge Infra… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | -0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.90 | $135.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $85.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 6.8M |
WBI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
COP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WBI as "Buy" and COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for COP (target: $133) vs 11.5% for WBI (target: $34). COP is the only dividend payer here at 2.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | WBIWaterBridge Infra… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $132.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% |
COP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
COP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WBI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallConocoPhillips (COP)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WBI vs COP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBI or COP a better buy right now?
ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the better valuation at 18.
2x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBI or COP?
On forward P/E, ConocoPhillips is actually cheaper at 11.
3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or COP?
Over the past 5 years, ConocoPhillips (COP) delivered a total return of +123.
2%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +220. 0% versus WBI's +21. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBI or COP?
On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 36% for ConocoPhillips — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — WBI or COP?
ConocoPhillips (COP) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
6% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COP leads at 19. 6% versus 15. 0% for WBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WBI leads at 27. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WBI or COP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ConocoPhillips (COP) trades at 11.
3x forward P/E versus 58. 8x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 47. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COP: 15. 2% to $132. 92.
07Which pays a better dividend — WBI or COP?
In this comparison, COP (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. WBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WBI or COP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
18), 2. 8% yield, +220. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COP: +220. 0%, WBI: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WBI and COP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
COP pays a dividend while WBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.