Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Solar
Solar
WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $29M | $5.34B | $3.49B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $148M | $3.73B | $3.17B | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-126M | $-2.34B | $568M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 59.9% | 23.5% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | -83.5% | 56.9% | -1.8% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.3x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $198M | $21.33B | $14.89B | $766M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $964M | $1.24B | $244M |
WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallbox N.V. (WBX) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BEPC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 0.26x
- Beta 0.99 vs RUN's 2.81, lower leverage
- 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 97.7% 10Y total return vs BEPC's 55.5%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs BEPC's -10.0%
- 17.9% margin vs WBX's -84.9%
ARRY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.39, current ratio 2.31x
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 15.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs BEPC's -10.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs WBX's -84.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs RUN's 2.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.9% vs WBX's -61.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs WBX's -47.3%, ROIC -0.5% vs -38.4% |
WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BEPC leads 2 • WBX leads 0 • ARRY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 25.2x WBX's $148M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBX's -84.9%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $3.7B | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$110M | $3.4B | $541M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$126M | -$2.3B | $568M | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | -$745M | -$751M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +59.9% | +23.5% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -83.5% | +56.9% | -1.8% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -84.9% | -62.9% | +17.9% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.1% | -20.0% | -23.6% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | -5.0% | +43.2% | -26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.6% | -192.7% | +2.1% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BEPC and ARRY each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BEPC's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $5.3B | $3.5B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $222M | $25.7B | $17.1B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | -2.81x | 8.54x | -11.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.26x | 11.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.64x | 24.67x | 13.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 1.43x | 1.18x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.52x | 0.80x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 16.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-183 for WBX. BEPC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs BEPC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -182.7% | -20.2% | +12.4% | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | -4.6% | +2.5% | -4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.4% | +5.4% | -0.5% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.9% | +5.7% | -0.6% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.69x | 2.99x | 2.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $193M | $20.4B | $13.6B | $522M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $964M | $1.2B | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $198M | $21.3B | $14.9B | $766M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.94x | -0.41x | -0.02x | -2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BEPC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BEPC five years ago would be worth $11,103 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for WBX. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +71.9% total return vs WBX's -61.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEPC at 5.2% vs WBX's -65.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.2% | -7.1% | -24.8% | -11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.8% | +35.2% | +71.9% | +55.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | +16.5% | -15.0% | -54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +11.0% | -64.2% | -65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +55.5% | +97.7% | -76.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.9% | +5.2% | -5.3% | -22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
BEPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BEPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEPC currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs WBX's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.99x | 2.81x | 2.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.00 | $45.10 | $22.44 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $27.72 | $5.38 | $5.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +81.3% | +65.1% | +70.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 41.8 | 55.7 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 1.5M | 10.3M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RUN and ARRY each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBX as "Buy", BEPC as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for WBX (target: $4) vs -1.9% for BEPC (target: $36).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $36.00 | $18.25 | $9.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 | 37 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RUN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BEPC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
WBX vs BEPC vs RUN vs ARRY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wallbox N. V. (WBX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY?
On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) delivered a total return of +11.
0%, compared to -98. 6% for Wallbox N. V. (WBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUN returned +97. 7% versus WBX's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning RUN is approximately 184% more volatile than BEPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -10. 0% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1020. 8% for Wallbox N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RUN leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -71. 1% for Wallbox N. V. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEPC leads at 56. 9% versus -68. 7% for WBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEPC leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Sunrun Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WBX: 45. 5% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WBX or BEPC or RUN or ARRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99)). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEPC: +55. 5%, ARRY: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBX and BEPC and RUN and ARRY?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBX (Technology) and BEPC (Utilities) and RUN (Energy) and ARRY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.