WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$41.65B
5Y Perf.+45.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WDS vs BP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BP
BP p.l.c.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$114.36B
5Y Perf.+89.3%
WDS vs BP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WDS | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $41.65B | $114.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.15B | $194.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 19.3% |
| Operating Margin | 32.6% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $13.72B | $84.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.71B | $36.56B |
WDS vs BP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WDS
BP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 145.2 | +45.2% |
| BP p.l.c. (BP) | 100 | 189.3 | +89.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WDS vs BP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WDS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. BP p.l.c. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
The Income Pick
WDS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 34.4%, current ratio 1.59x
- Beta 0.07, yield 4.8%, current ratio 1.59x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BP
BP p.l.c.
The Growth Play
BP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.1%, EPS growth -85.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 101.8% 10Y total return vs WDS's 72.0%
- 0.1% revenue growth vs WDS's -1.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BP | 0.1% revenue growth vs WDS's -1.5% |
| Value | BP | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 10.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | WDS | 24.1% margin vs BP's 1.6% |
| Stability / Safety | WDS | Lower D/E ratio (34.4% vs 113.9%) |
| Dividends | WDS | 4.8% yield, vs BP's 4.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WDS | +77.8% vs BP's +62.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WDS | 9.5% ROA vs BP's 1.1%, ROIC 6.3% vs 9.8% |
WDS vs BP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
WDS vs BP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBPLAGGINGWDS
WDSWoodside Energy Group…
1leads
BPBP p.l.c.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WDSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BP3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WDS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BP4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BP2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WDS and BP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BP is the larger business by revenue, generating $194.6B annually — 7.4x WDS's $26.2B. WDS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BP's 1.6%. On growth, BP holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.2B | $194.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.6B | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +4.5% |
Evenly matched — WDS and BP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, WDS trades at a 99% valuation discount to BP's 2147.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BP's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WDS's 5.3x.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.7B | $114.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.7B | $162.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.43x | 2147.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.36x | 8.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.28x | 4.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.12x |
BP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for BP. WDS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BP's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BP scores 7/9 vs WDS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $47.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.7B | $36.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.7B | $84.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.20x | 3.55x |
WDS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BP five years ago would be worth $19,368 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,071 for WDS. Over the past 12 months, WDS leads with a +77.8% total return vs BP's +62.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BP at 10.0% vs WDS's 3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.6% | +23.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.8% | +62.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +33.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.7% | +93.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.0% | +101.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +10.0% |
BP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WDS's 0.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BP currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs WDS's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.19 | $48.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.90 | $27.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 15.1M |
BP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WDS and BP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WDS as "Hold" and BP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs 0.2% for BP (target: $44). For income investors, WDS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.80% vs BP's 4.36%.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $43.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $1.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.9% |
Evenly matched — WDS and BP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). WDS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallBP p.l.c. (BP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WDS vs BP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDS or BP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BP p.
l. c. (BP) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDS or BP?
On trailing P/E, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus BP p. l. c. at 2147. 5x. On forward P/E, BP p. l. c. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDS or BP?
Over the past 5 years, BP p.
l. c. (BP) delivered a total return of +93. 7%, compared to +60. 7% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BP returned +101. 8% versus WDS's +72. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDS or BP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BP p.
l. c. (BP) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Woodside Energy Group Ltd's 0. 07β — meaning WDS is approximately -637% more volatile than BP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 114% for BP p. l. c. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WDS or BP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BP p.
l. c. (BP) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -1. 5% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Woodside Energy Group Ltd grew EPS -24. 1% year-over-year, compared to -85. 4% for BP p. l. c.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BP leads at -7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WDS or BP?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
9% net margin versus 0. 0% for BP p. l. c. — meaning it keeps 20. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDS leads at 29. 8% versus 8. 2% for BP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDS leads at 34. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WDS or BP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BP p.
l. c. (BP) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 27. 8% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WDS or BP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 4. 4% for BP p. l. c. (BP).
09Is WDS or BP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BP p.
l. c. (BP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), 4. 4% yield, +101. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BP: +101. 8%, WDS: +72. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WDS and BP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WDS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(WDS: -11.1% · BP: 11.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(WDS: 15.4x · BP: 2147.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.