Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WFCF vs HCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
WFCF vs HCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $85M | $288M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $297M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 56.3x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $18M |
WFCF vs HCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where Food Comes Fr… (WFCF) | 100 | 263.9 | +163.9% |
| The Hackett Group, … (HCKT) | 100 | 82.7 | -17.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WFCF vs HCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WFCF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.19
- 92.8% 10Y total return vs HCKT's 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 2.03x
HCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth -2.6%, EPS growth -55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- PEG 0.31 vs WFCF's 8.80
- -2.6% revenue growth vs WFCF's -3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.6% revenue growth vs WFCF's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 56.3x), PEG 0.31 vs 8.80 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs HCKT's 4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs HCKT's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.7% vs HCKT's -50.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs HCKT's 7.0%, ROIC 10.0% vs 16.4% |
WFCF vs HCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WFCF vs HCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WFCF and HCKT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $297M annually — 11.9x WFCF's $25M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.2% (WFCF) to 4.7% (HCKT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $297M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +30.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.3% | -11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -122.1% | +54.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HCKT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.3x trailing earnings, HCKT trades at a 57% valuation discount to WFCF's 56.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCKT offers better value at 1.08x vs WFCF's 8.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $288M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $349M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 56.30x | 24.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.80x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 45.07x | 10.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.38x | 4.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 58.82x | 8.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WFCF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCKT delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $16 for WFCF. WFCF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCKT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WFCF scores 7/9 vs HCKT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.7% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.0% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 744.00x | 37.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WFCF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFCF five years ago would be worth $12,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,118 for HCKT. Over the past 12 months, WFCF leads with a +50.7% total return vs HCKT's -50.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WFCF at 6.4% vs HCKT's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.2% | -41.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.7% | -50.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.9% | -18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.8% | +0.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | -11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WFCF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WFCF is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCKT's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WFCF currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs HCKT's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.15 | $26.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.26 | $9.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.3% | +43.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.3 | 28.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 299K |
Analyst Outlook
HCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
HCKT is the only dividend payer here at 4.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +24.0% |
WFCF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HCKT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WFCF vs HCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WFCF or HCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is the stronger pick with -2. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF). The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WFCF or HCKT?
On trailing P/E, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus Where Food Comes From, Inc. at 56. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WFCF or HCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Where Food Comes From, Inc.
(WFCF) delivered a total return of +22. 9%, compared to -18. 8% for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFCF returned +92. 8% versus HCKT's +0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WFCF or HCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Where Food Comes From, Inc.
(WFCF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus The Hackett Group, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HCKT is approximately 464% more volatile than WFCF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 117% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WFCF or HCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is pulling ahead at -2. 6% versus -3. 3% for Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Where Food Comes From, Inc. grew EPS -25. 0% year-over-year, compared to -55. 2% for The Hackett Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCKT leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WFCF or HCKT?
Where Food Comes From, Inc.
(WFCF) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus 4. 2% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCKT leads at 8. 7% versus 4. 8% for WFCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCKT leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — WFCF or HCKT?
In this comparison, HCKT (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. WFCF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WFCF or HCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Where Food Comes From, Inc.
(WFCF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WFCF: +92. 8%, HCKT: +0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WFCF and HCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WFCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HCKT pays a dividend while WFCF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.