Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WFRD vs BKR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WFRD
Weatherford International plc

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.77B
5Y Perf.+5318.5%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$66.10B
5Y Perf.+303.7%

WFRD vs BKR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WFRD logoWFRD
BKR logoBKR
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$7.77B$66.10B
Revenue (TTM)$4.88B$27.89B
Net Income (TTM)$463M$3.12B
Gross Margin45.9%23.6%
Operating Margin15.1%25.3%
Forward P/E19.0x27.8x
Total Debt$1.75B$7.14B
Cash & Equiv.$1.04B$3.71B

WFRD vs BKRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WFRD
BKR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Weatherford Interna… (WFRD)1005418.5+5318.5%
Baker Hughes Company (BKR)100403.7+303.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WFRD vs BKR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BKR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Weatherford International plc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
The Long-Run Compounder

WFRD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 350.7% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.3%
  • Lower P/E (19.0x vs 27.8x)
  • +150.8% vs BKR's +86.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Income Pick

BKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.4%
  • Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 37.6%, current ratio 1.36x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBKR logoBKR-0.3% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8%
ValueWFRD logoWFRDLower P/E (19.0x vs 27.8x)
Quality / MarginsBKR logoBKR11.2% margin vs WFRD's 9.5%
Stability / SafetyBKR logoBKRBeta 0.83 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage
DividendsBKR logoBKR1.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WFRD's 0.9%
Momentum (1Y)WFRD logoWFRD+150.8% vs BKR's +86.3%
Efficiency (ROA)WFRD logoWFRD9.3% ROA vs BKR's 7.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs 12.7%

WFRD vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WFRDWeatherford International plc
FY 2025
Service
60.6%$3.0B
Product
39.4%$1.9B
BKRBaker Hughes Company
FY 2025
Oilfield Services And Equipment
51.6%$14.3B
Industrial And Energy Technology
48.4%$13.4B

WFRD vs BKR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWFRDLAGGINGBKR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 5.7x WFRD's $4.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (BKR) to 9.5% (WFRD). On growth, BKR holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWFRD logoWFRDWeatherford Inter…BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.9B$27.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.0B$4.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$463M$3.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$466M$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.9%+23.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.1%+25.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.5%+11.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.6%+9.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.4%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+44.7%+132.5%
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.3x trailing earnings, WFRD trades at a 29% valuation discount to BKR's 25.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WFRD's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.7x.

MetricWFRD logoWFRDWeatherford Inter…BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
Market CapShares × price$7.8B$66.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.5B$69.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.27x25.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.01x27.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.29x14.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.58x2.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.64x3.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.27x26.06x
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WFRD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

WFRD delivers a 28.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $16 for BKR. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFRD's 1.03x.

MetricWFRD logoWFRDWeatherford Inter…BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+28.3%+16.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.3%+7.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.9%+12.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.2%+13.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.03x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$709M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.0B$3.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.8B$7.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.45x9.68x
WFRD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WFRD five years ago would be worth $98,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30,743 for BKR. Over the past 12 months, WFRD leads with a +150.8% total return vs BKR's +86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 35.2% vs WFRD's 22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWFRD logoWFRDWeatherford Inter…BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.7%+42.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+150.8%+86.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+83.7%+147.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+881.5%+207.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+350.7%+186.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.5%+35.2%
Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BKR is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFRD's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricWFRD logoWFRDWeatherford Inter…BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.25x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$112.22$70.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$42.58$35.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+94.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.261.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M9.0M
Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates WFRD as "Buy" and BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -24.3% for WFRD (target: $82). For income investors, BKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.37% vs WFRD's 0.92%.

MetricWFRD logoWFRDWeatherford Inter…BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$82.00$72.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3945
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises34
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.99$0.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.3%+0.6%
BKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). WFRD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallWeatherford International p… (WFRD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WFRD vs BKR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WFRD or BKR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). Weatherford International plc (WFRD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weatherford International plc (WFRD) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WFRD or BKR?

On trailing P/E, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the cheapest at 18.

3x versus Baker Hughes Company at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, Weatherford International plc is actually cheaper at 19. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WFRD or BKR?

Over the past 5 years, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) delivered a total return of +881.

5%, compared to +207. 4% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFRD returned +350. 7% versus BKR's +186. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WFRD or BKR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus Weatherford International plc's 1. 25β — meaning WFRD is approximately 50% more volatile than BKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 103% for Weatherford International plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WFRD or BKR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.

3% versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weatherford International plc grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -12. 8% for Baker Hughes Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WFRD or BKR?

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

3% net margin versus 8. 8% for Weatherford International plc — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFRD leads at 15. 4% versus 12. 8% for BKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WFRD or BKR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) trades at 19.

0x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for Baker Hughes Company — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 8. 0% to $72. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WFRD or BKR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD).

09

Is WFRD or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 4% yield, +186. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKR: +186. 3%, WFRD: +350. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WFRD and BKR?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WFRD

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BKR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WFRD and BKR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WFRD: -3.4% · BKR: 2.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(WFRD: 9.5% · BKR: 11.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WFRD: 18.3x · BKR: 25.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.