Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WFRD vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
WFRD vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $7.77B | $66.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.88B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $463M | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 45.9% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.0x | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.75B | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $3.71B |
WFRD vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weatherford Interna… (WFRD) | 100 | 5418.5 | +5318.5% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 403.7 | +303.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WFRD vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WFRD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 350.7% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.3%
- Lower P/E (19.0x vs 27.8x)
- +150.8% vs BKR's +86.3%
BKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 37.6%, current ratio 1.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.3% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.0x vs 27.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs WFRD's 9.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WFRD's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +150.8% vs BKR's +86.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs BKR's 7.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs 12.7% |
WFRD vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WFRD vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 5.7x WFRD's $4.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (BKR) to 9.5% (WFRD). On growth, BKR holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $463M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $466M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.7% | +132.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, WFRD trades at a 29% valuation discount to BKR's 25.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WFRD's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $66.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.5B | $69.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.27x | 25.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.01x | 27.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.29x | 14.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 3.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 26.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD delivers a 28.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $16 for BKR. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFRD's 1.03x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.3% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.9% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $709M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.45x | 9.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFRD five years ago would be worth $98,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30,743 for BKR. Over the past 12 months, WFRD leads with a +150.8% total return vs BKR's +86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 35.2% vs WFRD's 22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.7% | +42.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +150.8% | +86.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.7% | +147.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +881.5% | +207.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +350.7% | +186.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.5% | +35.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WFRD and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKR is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFRD's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.22 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.58 | $35.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
BKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WFRD as "Buy" and BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -24.3% for WFRD (target: $82). For income investors, BKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.37% vs WFRD's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.00 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +0.6% |
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). WFRD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
WFRD vs BKR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WFRD or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). Weatherford International plc (WFRD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weatherford International plc (WFRD) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WFRD or BKR?
On trailing P/E, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus Baker Hughes Company at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, Weatherford International plc is actually cheaper at 19. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WFRD or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) delivered a total return of +881.
5%, compared to +207. 4% for Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFRD returned +350. 7% versus BKR's +186. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WFRD or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Weatherford International plc's 1. 25β — meaning WFRD is approximately 50% more volatile than BKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 103% for Weatherford International plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WFRD or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weatherford International plc grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -12. 8% for Baker Hughes Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WFRD or BKR?
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
3% net margin versus 8. 8% for Weatherford International plc — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFRD leads at 15. 4% versus 12. 8% for BKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WFRD or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) trades at 19.
0x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for Baker Hughes Company — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 8. 0% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WFRD or BKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD).
09Is WFRD or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +186. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKR: +186. 3%, WFRD: +350. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WFRD and BKR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.