Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WGS vs ILMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WGS
GeneDx Holdings Corp.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.20B
5Y Perf.-88.0%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.07B
5Y Perf.-55.7%

WGS vs ILMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WGS logoWGS
ILMN logoILMN
IndustryMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$1.20B$21.07B
Revenue (TTM)$443M$4.39B
Net Income (TTM)$-78M$853M
Gross Margin68.3%67.1%
Operating Margin-14.8%20.9%
Forward P/E51.1x26.8x
Total Debt$152M$2.55B
Cash & Equiv.$105M$1.42B

WGS vs ILMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WGS
ILMN
StockNov 20May 26Return
GeneDx Holdings Cor… (WGS)10012.0-88.0%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10044.3-55.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WGS vs ILMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. GeneDx Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WGS
GeneDx Holdings Corp.
The Growth Play

WGS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 62.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 49.3%, current ratio 2.46x
  • 40.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.23
  • 0.7% 10Y total return vs WGS's -87.5%
  • Beta 1.23, current ratio 2.08x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWGS logoWGS40.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
ValueILMN logoILMNLower P/E (26.8x vs 51.1x)
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs WGS's -17.6%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 1.23 vs WGS's 1.89
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ILMN logoILMN+81.7% vs WGS's -29.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs WGS's -15.3%, ROIC 16.8% vs -2.8%

WGS vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WGSGeneDx Holdings Corp.
FY 2025
Diagnostic Test
49.4%$417M
Diagnostic Test, Third Party Insurance
40.9%$345M
Diagnostic Test, Institutional Customers
8.3%$70M
Product and Service, Other
1.3%$11M
Diagnostic Test, Self Pay
0.2%$1M
ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M

WGS vs ILMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGWGS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 9.9x WGS's $443M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WGS's -17.6%. On growth, WGS holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWGS logoWGSGeneDx Holdings C…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$443M$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$78M$853M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$29M$989M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.3%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-14.8%+20.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.6%+19.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.5%+22.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.4%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.4%+6.1%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — WGS and ILMN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ILMN's 19.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WGS's 93.1x.

MetricWGS logoWGSGeneDx Holdings C…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$21.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$22.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-55.48x25.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.51.10x26.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple93.08x19.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.81x4.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.53x7.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF84.31x22.63x
Evenly matched — WGS and ILMN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-28 for WGS. WGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs WGS's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWGS logoWGSGeneDx Holdings C…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-27.5%+32.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-15.3%+13.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.8%+16.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.9%+17.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.49x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$47M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$152M$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.13x12.09x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,017 for WGS. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +81.7% total return vs WGS's -29.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WGS at 66.0% vs ILMN's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWGS logoWGSGeneDx Holdings C…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-69.4%+3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-29.4%+81.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+357.6%-27.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.8%-62.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.5%+0.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+66.0%-10.0%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WGS's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs WGS's 23.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWGS logoWGSGeneDx Holdings C…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.89x1.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$170.87$155.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$32.21$73.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+23.7%+89.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10024.065.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M1.5M
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates WGS as "Buy" and ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 248.1% upside for WGS (target: $141) vs 6.3% for ILMN (target: $147).

MetricWGS logoWGSGeneDx Holdings C…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$141.00$147.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts1150
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WGS vs ILMN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WGS or ILMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, GeneDx Holdings Corp.

(WGS) is the stronger pick with 40. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WGS or ILMN?

On forward P/E, Illumina, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 26. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WGS or ILMN?

Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) delivered a total return of -62. 8%, compared to -89. 8% for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ILMN returned +0. 7% versus WGS's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WGS or ILMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus GeneDx Holdings Corp. 's 1. 89β — meaning WGS is approximately 53% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WGS or ILMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GeneDx Holdings Corp.

(WGS) is pulling ahead at 40. 0% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to 62. 4% for GeneDx Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WGS leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WGS or ILMN?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -4. 9% for GeneDx Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -2. 8% for WGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WGS leads at 69. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WGS or ILMN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) trades at 26. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 1x for GeneDx Holdings Corp. — 24. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WGS: 248. 1% to $141. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WGS or ILMN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is WGS or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +0. 7%, WGS: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WGS and ILMN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WGS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WGS and ILMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WGS: 17.4% · ILMN: 4.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.