Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WHG vs VRTS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WHG
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$155M
5Y Perf.-7.6%
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$949M
5Y Perf.+52.5%

WHG vs VRTS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WHG logoWHG
VRTS logoVRTS
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsAsset Management
Market Cap$155M$949M
Revenue (TTM)$98M$831M
Net Income (TTM)$7M$138M
Gross Margin86.5%74.9%
Operating Margin7.1%17.4%
Forward P/E2.0x5.5x
Total Debt$10M$2.84B
Cash & Equiv.$26M$477M

WHG vs VRTSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WHG
VRTS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Westwood Holdings G… (WHG)10092.4-7.6%
Virtus Investment P… (VRTS)100152.5+52.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WHG vs VRTS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WHG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WHG
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 203.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 8.0%, current ratio 1.81x
  • NIM 1.0% vs VRTS's 0.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
The Banking Pick

VRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 6.6%
  • 142.6% 10Y total return vs WHG's -43.9%
  • Beta 1.14, yield 6.6%, current ratio 3.80x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWHG logoWHG3.2% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
ValueWHG logoWHGLower P/E (2.0x vs 5.5x)
Quality / MarginsVRTS logoVRTSEfficiency ratio 0.6% vs WHG's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyWHG logoWHGBeta 0.60 vs VRTS's 1.14, lower leverage
DividendsVRTS logoVRTS6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs WHG's 3.7%
Momentum (1Y)WHG logoWHG+8.7% vs VRTS's -5.5%
Efficiency (ROA)VRTS logoVRTSEfficiency ratio 0.6% vs WHG's 0.8%

WHG vs VRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WHGWestwood Holdings Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Asset Management
76.7%$75M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.1%$22M
Investment Performance
0.9%$874,000
Trust performance-based fees
0.3%$260,000
VRTSVirtus Investment Partners, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Management Fees
50.0%$725M
Open End Funds
19.8%$287M
Retail Separate Accounts
14.5%$210M
Institutional Accounts
11.6%$168M
Closed End Funds
4.2%$61M

WHG vs VRTS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWHGLAGGINGVRTS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WHG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

VRTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $831M annually — 8.5x WHG's $98M. VRTS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHG's 7.2%.

MetricWHG logoWHGWestwood Holdings…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$98M$831M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$205M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$138M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M-$67M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+86.5%+74.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.1%+17.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.2%+16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.3%-8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+65.4%+10.9%
WHG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

VRTS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 7.1x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 66% valuation discount to WHG's 20.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHG's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRTS's 16.2x.

MetricWHG logoWHGWestwood Holdings…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
Market CapShares × price$155M$949M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$139M$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.73x7.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.02x5.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.48x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.27x16.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.59x1.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.15x0.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.69x
VRTS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WHG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

VRTS delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for WHG. WHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRTS's 2.74x.

MetricWHG logoWHGWestwood Holdings…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.9%+13.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.8%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.9%+3.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.4%+3.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x2.74x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$16M$2.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26M$477M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$2.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.15x
WHG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WHG five years ago would be worth $10,994 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,496 for VRTS. Over the past 12 months, WHG leads with a +8.7% total return vs VRTS's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WHG at 13.6% vs VRTS's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWHG logoWHGWestwood Holdings…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.2%-9.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.7%-5.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.7%+0.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.9%-35.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.9%+142.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.6%+0.0%
WHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WHG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WHG is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VRTS's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WHG currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWHG logoWHGWestwood Holdings…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x1.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.99$215.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.51$121.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.3%+65.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.355.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12K101K
WHG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.58% vs WHG's 3.69%.

MetricWHG logoWHGWestwood Holdings…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$163.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%+6.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises07
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$9.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.9%+6.3%
VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WHG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallWestwood Holdings Group, In… (WHG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WHG vs VRTS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WHG or VRTS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

(WHG) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WHG or VRTS?

On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WHG or VRTS?

Over the past 5 years, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

(WHG) delivered a total return of +9. 9%, compared to -35. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTS returned +142. 6% versus WHG's -43. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WHG or VRTS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

(WHG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning VRTS is approximately 91% more volatile than WHG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (WHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 3% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WHG or VRTS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

(WHG) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. grew EPS 203. 8% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WHG or VRTS?

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 7. 2% for Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTS leads at 17. 4% versus 7. 1% for WHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WHG leads at 86. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WHG or VRTS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

(WHG) trades at 2. 0x forward P/E versus 5. 5x for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WHG or VRTS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 3. 7% for Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (WHG).

09

Is WHG or VRTS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.

(WHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHG: -43. 9%, VRTS: +142. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WHG and VRTS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WHG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WHG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRTS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WHG and VRTS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WHG: 3.2% · VRTS: -8.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(WHG: 7.2% · VRTS: 16.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WHG: 20.7x · VRTS: 7.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.