Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WHR vs AAON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
WHR vs AAON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.11B | $10.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.18B | $1.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $246M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 65.3x |
| Total Debt | $7.86B | $433M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $669M | $13K |
WHR vs AAON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whirlpool Corporati… (WHR) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
| AAON, Inc. (AAON) | 100 | 357.9 | +257.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHR vs AAON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 0.76x
- Beta 1.27, yield 11.0%, current ratio 0.76x
AAON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth -36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs WHR's -41.6%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 65.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs WHR's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs AAON's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 11.0% yield, vs AAON's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.5% vs WHR's -31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs WHR's 1.5%, ROIC 9.4% vs 5.8% |
WHR vs AAON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WHR vs AAON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 9.4x AAON's $1.6B. AAON is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHR's 1.6%. On growth, AAON holds the edge at +54.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $847M | $228M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $246M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | -9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.6% | +54.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +37.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WHR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, WHR trades at a 91% valuation discount to AAON's 100.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHR's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAON's 48.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.52x | 100.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 65.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 18.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.67x | 48.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 7.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 12.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.77x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAON leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAON delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for WHR. AAON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHR's 2.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WHR scores 5/9 vs AAON's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.89x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.2B | $433M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $669M | $13,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $433M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | 11.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAON leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAON five years ago would be worth $29,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,147 for WHR. Over the past 12 months, AAON leads with a +35.5% total return vs WHR's -31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAON at 26.3% vs WHR's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.1% | +63.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.2% | +35.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.3% | +101.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | +196.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.6% | +612.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.3% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WHR and AAON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WHR is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAON's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAON currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs WHR's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $111.96 | $148.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.87 | $62.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 965K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WHR and AAON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WHR as "Hold" and AAON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for WHR (target: $62) vs -7.9% for AAON (target: $119). For income investors, WHR offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs AAON's 0.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.0% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.32 | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
AAON leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WHR vs AAON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHR or AAON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AAON, Inc. (AAON) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHR or AAON?
On trailing P/E, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus AAON, Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, Whirlpool Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHR or AAON?
Over the past 5 years, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) delivered a total return of +196. 3%, compared to -68. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAON returned +612. 1% versus WHR's -41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHR or AAON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus AAON, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning AAON is approximately 44% more volatile than WHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AAON, Inc. (AAON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 3% for Whirlpool Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHR or AAON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whirlpool Corporation grew EPS 196. 4% year-over-year, compared to -36. 1% for AAON, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAON leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHR or AAON?
AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus 2. 0% for Whirlpool Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAON leads at 10. 1% versus 4. 7% for WHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAON leads at 26. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHR or AAON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 65. 3x for AAON, Inc. — 55. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WHR: 27. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHR or AAON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the highest yield at 11. 0%, versus 0. 3% for AAON, Inc. (AAON).
09Is WHR or AAON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27), 11. 0% yield). AAON, Inc. (AAON) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHR: -41. 6%, AAON: +612. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHR and AAON?
These companies operate in different sectors (WHR (Consumer Cyclical) and AAON (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAON is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WHR pays a dividend while AAON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.