Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Industrial - Distribution
Security & Protection Services
WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Distribution | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $3.11B | $6.29B | $12.47B | $17.45B | $11.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.18B | $10.99B | $15.23B | $7.24B | $4.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $246M | $414M | $371M | $496M | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 24.3% | 30.0% | 28.4% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 4.9% | 7.8% | 9.8% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 11.2x | 17.6x | 34.0x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $7.86B | $2.76B | $5.86B | $479M | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $669M | $856M | $280M | $433M | $356M |
WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whirlpool Corporati… (WHR) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Watsco, Inc. (WSO) | 100 | 241.3 | +141.3% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 11.0%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 34.0x)
- 11.0% yield, vs SWK's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MHK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +41.7% vs WHR's -31.2%
WSO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 281.5% 10Y total return vs ALLE's 127.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 14.9%, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 1.10, yield 2.9%, current ratio 4.12x
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- PEG 0.92 vs WSO's 2.88
- 7.8% revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5%
- 15.2% margin vs WHR's 1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 34.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs WHR's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 11.0% yield, vs SWK's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.7% vs WHR's -31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs WHR's 1.5%, ROIC 18.1% vs 5.8% |
WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALLE leads in 2 of 6 categories
WSO leads 1 • WHR leads 0 • MHK leads 0 • SWK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 3.7x ALLE's $4.2B. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHR's 1.6%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $11.0B | $15.2B | $7.2B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $847M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $757M | $959M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $246M | $414M | $371M | $496M | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $709M | $726M | $702M | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +24.3% | +30.0% | +28.4% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +4.9% | +7.8% | +9.8% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +3.8% | +2.4% | +6.8% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +6.5% | +4.8% | +9.7% | +16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.6% | +8.0% | +2.7% | +0.1% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +65.2% | -35.0% | -3.1% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WHR and MHK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, WHR trades at a 76% valuation discount to WSO's 35.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs WSO's 2.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $6.3B | $12.5B | $17.5B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $8.2B | $18.0B | $17.5B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.52x | 17.33x | 30.26x | 35.04x | 18.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 11.23x | 17.64x | 34.05x | 15.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.97x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.67x | 7.05x | 11.71x | 23.76x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.58x | 0.82x | 2.41x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 0.77x | 1.35x | 5.05x | 5.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.77x | 10.20x | 18.12x | 32.59x | 17.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. WSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHR's 2.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHK scores 6/9 vs WSO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +5.0% | +4.1% | +15.3% | +32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +3.0% | +1.7% | +10.8% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +3.9% | +5.8% | +16.6% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +4.8% | +7.0% | +19.0% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.89x | 0.33x | 0.65x | 0.15x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.2B | $1.9B | $5.6B | $46M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $669M | $856M | $280M | $433M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $2.8B | $5.9B | $479M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | 36.90x | 2.07x | — | 8.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSO five years ago would be worth $15,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,147 for WHR. Over the past 12 months, SWK leads with a +41.7% total return vs WHR's -31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSO at 11.2% vs WHR's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.1% | -6.2% | +5.9% | +25.4% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.2% | +1.9% | +41.7% | -6.0% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.3% | +2.9% | +6.9% | +37.6% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -55.3% | -56.2% | +59.8% | +3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.6% | -47.6% | -1.5% | +281.5% | +127.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.3% | +0.9% | +2.2% | +11.2% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WSO and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSO currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs WHR's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.34x | 1.83x | 1.10x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $111.96 | $143.13 | $93.37 | $496.25 | $183.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.87 | $93.60 | $58.23 | $323.05 | $131.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +71.8% | +85.9% | +86.5% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 50.6 | 61.0 | 56.2 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.1M | 2.0M | 452K | 887K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WHR and SWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WHR as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", WSO as "Hold", ALLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for WHR (target: $62) vs -6.9% for WSO (target: $400). For income investors, WHR offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $130.00 | $89.17 | $399.80 | $172.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 32 | 37 | 26 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.0% | — | +4.1% | +2.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 16 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.32 | — | $3.29 | $12.50 | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.1% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
ALLE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WSO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
WHR vs MHK vs SWK vs WSO vs ALLE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE?
On trailing P/E, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus Watsco, Inc. at 35. 0x. On forward P/E, Whirlpool Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Watsco, Inc. 's 2. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE?
Over the past 5 years, Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) delivered a total return of +59. 8%, compared to -68. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSO returned +281. 5% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 175% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watsco, Inc. (WSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for Whirlpool Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whirlpool Corporation grew EPS 196. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 2. 0% for Whirlpool Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus 4. 7% for WHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Watsco, Inc. 's 2. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 0x for Watsco, Inc. — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WHR: 27. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE?
In this comparison, WHR (11.
0% yield), SWK (4. 1% yield), WSO (2. 9% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MHK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WHR or MHK or SWK or WSO or ALLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHR and MHK and SWK and WSO and ALLE?
These companies operate in different sectors (WHR (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and SWK (Industrials) and WSO (Industrials) and ALLE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WSO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WHR, SWK, WSO, ALLE pay a dividend while MHK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.