Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WHR vs WSO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
WHR vs WSO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $3.11B | $17.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.18B | $7.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $246M | $496M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 34.0x |
| Total Debt | $7.86B | $479M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $669M | $433M |
WHR vs WSO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whirlpool Corporati… (WHR) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
| Watsco, Inc. (WSO) | 100 | 241.3 | +141.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHR vs WSO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 34.0x)
- 11.0% yield, vs WSO's 2.9%
WSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth -5.0%, EPS growth -7.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.2%
- 281.5% 10Y total return vs WHR's -41.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.0% revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 34.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs WHR's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs WHR's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.0% yield, vs WSO's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.0% vs WHR's -31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs WHR's 1.5%, ROIC 16.6% vs 5.8% |
WHR vs WSO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WHR vs WSO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 2.1x WSO's $7.2B. WSO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHR's 1.6%. On growth, WSO holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $847M | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $246M | $496M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $702M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.6% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, WHR trades at a 76% valuation discount to WSO's 35.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHR's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WSO's 23.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $17.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $17.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.52x | 35.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 34.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.67x | 23.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.77x | 32.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSO leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WSO delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for WHR. WSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHR's 2.89x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.89x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.2B | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $669M | $433M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $479M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSO five years ago would be worth $15,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,147 for WHR. Over the past 12 months, WSO leads with a -6.0% total return vs WHR's -31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSO at 11.2% vs WHR's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.1% | +25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.2% | -6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.3% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | +59.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.6% | +281.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.3% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WSO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WSO is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHR's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSO currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs WHR's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $111.96 | $496.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.87 | $323.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 452K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WHR and WSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WHR as "Hold" and WSO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for WHR (target: $62) vs -6.9% for WSO (target: $400). For income investors, WHR offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs WSO's 2.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $399.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.32 | $12.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
WSO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WHR vs WSO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHR or WSO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) is the stronger pick with -5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHR or WSO?
On trailing P/E, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus Watsco, Inc. at 35. 0x. On forward P/E, Whirlpool Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHR or WSO?
Over the past 5 years, Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) delivered a total return of +59. 8%, compared to -68. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSO returned +281. 5% versus WHR's -41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHR or WSO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Whirlpool Corporation's 1. 27β — meaning WHR is approximately 15% more volatile than WSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watsco, Inc. (WSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for Whirlpool Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHR or WSO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) is pulling ahead at -5. 0% versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whirlpool Corporation grew EPS 196. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 9% for Watsco, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WSO leads at -0. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHR or WSO?
Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus 2. 0% for Whirlpool Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSO leads at 9. 6% versus 4. 7% for WHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSO leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHR or WSO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 34. 0x for Watsco, Inc. — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WHR: 27. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHR or WSO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the highest yield at 11. 0%, versus 2. 9% for Watsco, Inc. (WSO).
09Is WHR or WSO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 2. 9% yield, +281. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSO: +281. 5%, WHR: -41. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHR and WSO?
These companies operate in different sectors (WHR (Consumer Cyclical) and WSO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.