Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WILC vs JBSS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WILC
G. Willi-Food International Ltd.

Food Distribution

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$489M
5Y Perf.+147.4%
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$913M
5Y Perf.-10.2%

WILC vs JBSS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WILC logoWILC
JBSS logoJBSS
IndustryFood DistributionPackaged Foods
Market Cap$489M$913M
Revenue (TTM)$598M$1.14B
Net Income (TTM)$95M$70M
Gross Margin28.5%19.1%
Operating Margin12.5%8.9%
Forward P/E20.1x10.7x
Total Debt$5M$102M
Cash & Equiv.$123M$585K

WILC vs JBSSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WILC
JBSS
StockMay 20May 26Return
G. Willi-Food Inter… (WILC)100247.4+147.4%
John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS)10089.8-10.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WILC vs JBSS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WILC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WILC
G. Willi-Food International Ltd.
The Growth Play

WILC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
  • 9.5% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 101.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 8.74x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
The Income Pick

JBSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 2.7%
  • Beta 0.31, yield 2.7%, current ratio 2.22x
  • Beta 0.31 vs WILC's 0.83
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWILC logoWILC6.0% revenue growth vs JBSS's 3.8%
ValueWILC logoWILCPEG 3.74 vs 7.58
Quality / MarginsWILC logoWILC15.8% margin vs JBSS's 6.2%
Stability / SafetyJBSS logoJBSSBeta 0.31 vs WILC's 0.83
DividendsJBSS logoJBSS2.7% yield, vs WILC's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)WILC logoWILC+136.3% vs JBSS's +39.3%
Efficiency (ROA)WILC logoWILC16.3% ROA vs JBSS's 11.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 15.2%

WILC vs JBSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WILCG. Willi-Food International Ltd.
FY 2024
Other
100.0%$73M
JBSSJohn B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
FY 2015
Consumer Distribution Channel
59.6%$529M
Commercial Ingredients Distribution Channel
23.4%$207M
Contract Packaging Distribution Channel
12.9%$115M
Export Distribution Channel
4.1%$36M

WILC vs JBSS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWILCLAGGINGJBSS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WILC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JBSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.9x WILC's $598M. WILC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBSS's 6.2%. On growth, JBSS holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$598M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$82M$127M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$95M$70M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$21M$33M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.5%+19.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.5%+8.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.8%+6.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.5%+2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.0%+4.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.0%+31.9%
WILC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JBSS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, JBSS trades at a 23% valuation discount to WILC's 20.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WILC offers better value at 3.74x vs JBSS's 11.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…
Market CapShares × price$489M$913M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$448M$1.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.14x15.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.74x11.02x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.97x8.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x0.82x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.31x2.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
JBSS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JBSS delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $19 for WILC. WILC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBSS's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WILC scores 5/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.5%+19.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.3%+11.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+15.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.3%+20.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$118M$102M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$123M$585,000
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$102M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense67.29x26.02x
WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WILC five years ago would be worth $17,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,395 for JBSS. Over the past 12 months, WILC leads with a +136.3% total return vs JBSS's +39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WILC at 40.0% vs JBSS's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.1%+14.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+136.3%+39.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+174.3%-22.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.8%+4.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+951.8%+101.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+40.0%-8.3%
WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WILC and JBSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JBSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WILC's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WILC currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs JBSS's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.00$85.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.20$58.47
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.5%+91.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10075.549.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K80K
Evenly matched — WILC and JBSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JBSS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

For income investors, JBSS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.67% vs WILC's 0.70%.

MetricWILC logoWILCG. Willi-Food Int…JBSS logoJBSSJohn B. Sanfilipp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.72$2.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%
JBSS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

WILC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JBSS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallG. Willi-Food International… (WILC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WILC vs JBSS: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WILC or JBSS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WILC or JBSS?

On trailing P/E, John B.

Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. at 20. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WILC or JBSS?

Over the past 5 years, G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) delivered a total return of +73. 8%, compared to +4. 0% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WILC returned +951. 8% versus JBSS's +101. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WILC or JBSS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John B.

Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. 's 0. 83β — meaning WILC is approximately 167% more volatile than JBSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 28% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WILC or JBSS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus 3. 8% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WILC leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WILC or JBSS?

G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 5. 3% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WILC leads at 9. 5% versus 7. 7% for JBSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WILC leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — WILC or JBSS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 7% for G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC).

08

Is WILC or JBSS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, G.

Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 0. 7% yield, +951. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WILC: +951. 8%, JBSS: +101. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between WILC and JBSS?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WILC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WILC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JBSS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WILC and JBSS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WILC: 0.0% · JBSS: 4.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(WILC: 15.8% · JBSS: 6.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WILC: 20.1x · JBSS: 15.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.