Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WILC vs JBSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
WILC vs JBSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $489M | $913M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $598M | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $95M | $70M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $585K |
WILC vs JBSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. Willi-Food Inter… (WILC) | 100 | 247.4 | +147.4% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WILC vs JBSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WILC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- 9.5% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 101.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 8.74x
JBSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 2.7%
- Beta 0.31, yield 2.7%, current ratio 2.22x
- Beta 0.31 vs WILC's 0.83
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs JBSS's 3.8% | |
| Value | PEG 3.74 vs 7.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs JBSS's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs WILC's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, vs WILC's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs JBSS's +39.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs JBSS's 11.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 15.2% |
WILC vs JBSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WILC vs JBSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WILC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.9x WILC's $598M. WILC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBSS's 6.2%. On growth, JBSS holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $598M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $82M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $95M | $70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.0% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.0% | +31.9% |
Valuation Metrics
JBSS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JBSS trades at a 23% valuation discount to WILC's 20.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WILC offers better value at 3.74x vs JBSS's 11.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $489M | $913M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $448M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.14x | 15.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.74x | 11.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.97x | 8.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 0.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.31x | 2.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBSS delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $19 for WILC. WILC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBSS's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WILC scores 5/9 vs JBSS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.3% | +11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +15.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +20.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $585,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $102M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 67.29x | 26.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WILC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WILC five years ago would be worth $17,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,395 for JBSS. Over the past 12 months, WILC leads with a +136.3% total return vs JBSS's +39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WILC at 40.0% vs JBSS's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +136.3% | +39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.3% | -22.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.8% | +4.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +951.8% | +101.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.0% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WILC and JBSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WILC's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WILC currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs JBSS's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.00 | $85.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.20 | $58.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.5 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
JBSS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, JBSS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.67% vs WILC's 0.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $2.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
WILC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JBSS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WILC vs JBSS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WILC or JBSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, G.
Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WILC or JBSS?
On trailing P/E, John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. at 20. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WILC or JBSS?
Over the past 5 years, G.
Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) delivered a total return of +73. 8%, compared to +4. 0% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WILC returned +951. 8% versus JBSS's +101. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WILC or JBSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus G. Willi-Food International Ltd. 's 0. 83β — meaning WILC is approximately 167% more volatile than JBSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 28% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WILC or JBSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), G.
Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus 3. 8% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: G. Willi-Food International Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WILC leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WILC or JBSS?
G.
Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 5. 3% for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WILC leads at 9. 5% versus 7. 7% for JBSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WILC leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — WILC or JBSS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 7% for G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC).
08Is WILC or JBSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, G.
Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 0. 7% yield, +951. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WILC: +951. 8%, JBSS: +101. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WILC and JBSS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WILC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.