WINA vs UFPT

For growth investors, UFP Technologies, Inc.

(UFPT) is the stronger pick with 19. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Winmark Corporation (WINA). UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (23. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, UFP Technologies, Inc.

(UFPT) is the cheapest at 24. 9x versus Winmark Corporation at 32. 9x. On forward P/E, UFP Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UFP Technologies, Inc. wins at 0. 61x versus Winmark Corporation's 3. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, UFP Technologies, Inc.

(UFPT) delivered a total return of +304. 2%, compared to +115. 9% for Winmark Corporation (WINA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UFPT returned +766. 2% versus WINA's +358. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Winmark Corporation (WINA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

79β versus UFP Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning UFPT is approximately 28% more volatile than WINA relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UFP Technologies, Inc.

(UFPT) is pulling ahead at 19. 5% versus 5. 9% for Winmark Corporation (WINA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UFP Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 15. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Winmark Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UFPT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Winmark Corporation (WINA) is the more profitable company, earning 48.

4% net margin versus 11. 3% for UFP Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WINA leads at 63. 4% versus 15. 3% for UFPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WINA leads at 96. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus Winmark Corporation's 3. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Winmark Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UFPT: 36. 6% to $298. 00.

In this comparison, WINA (3.

6% yield) pays a dividend. UFPT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Winmark Corporation (WINA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 3. 6% yield, +358. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WINA: +358. 0%, UFPT: +766. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WINA (Consumer Cyclical) and UFPT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WINA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UFPT is a small-cap high-growth stock. WINA pays a dividend while UFPT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.