Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WKHS vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
WKHS vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $36M | $84.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | -236.8% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $5.89B |
WKHS vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WKHS vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WKHS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +284.0% vs UPS's +13.5%
UPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.4%
- Rev growth -2.5%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.0%
- 45.4% 10Y total return vs WKHS's -99.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.5% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs WKHS's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs WKHS's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +284.0% vs UPS's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs WKHS's -60.6%, ROIC 16.1% vs -77.6% |
WKHS vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WKHS vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 8317.6x WKHS's $11M. UPS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WKHS's -6.1%. On growth, UPS holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$52M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.0% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WKHS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $84.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $111.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 15.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.41x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 5.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-198 for WKHS. WKHS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPS scores 5/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -198.1% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.6% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -77.6% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -107.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.84x | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UPS five years ago would be worth $6,063 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +284.0% total return vs UPS's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPS at -11.8% vs WKHS's -75.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.8% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +284.0% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -31.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -39.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.0% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WKHS's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UPS currently trades 81.6% from its 52-week high vs WKHS's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.80 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.53 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.5% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
UPS is the only dividend payer here at 6.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.2% |
UPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WKHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
WKHS vs UPS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WKHS or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger pick with -2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WKHS or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) delivered a total return of -39. 4%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPS returned +45. 4% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WKHS or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Workhorse Group Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning WKHS is approximately 62% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WKHS or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is pulling ahead at -2. 5% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for United Parcel Service, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WKHS or UPS?
United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPS leads at 9. 6% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPS leads at 18. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WKHS or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
4% yield) pays a dividend. WKHS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WKHS or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +45. 4%, WKHS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WKHS and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UPS pays a dividend while WKHS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare UPS vs FDX
FDX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to UPS.
Compare WKHS vs RIVN
RIVN overlaps with WKHS in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With FDX + AMZN
FDX and AMZN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.