Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Information Technology Services
Solar
Solar
WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Information Technology Services | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $6M | $3M | $25M | $330M | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $4M | $299M | $110M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-7M | $-4M | $3M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 16.5% | 14.7% | 22.8% | 43.7% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -127.4% | -49.4% | -1.4% | -2.7% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 100.5x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $22M | $34M | $3M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $325K | $28M | $8M | $474M |
WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worksport Ltd. (WKSP) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WKSP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 454.7% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27 vs WKSP's 2.84
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
TYGO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 91.7%, EPS growth 97.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- -55.8% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- +383.3% vs WKSP's -61.2%
ENPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (18.0x vs 100.5x)
- 9.6% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
- 4.2% ROA vs WKSP's -70.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -59.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 454.7% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 100.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs WKSP's 2.84 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +383.3% vs WKSP's -61.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs WKSP's -70.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -59.2% |
WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ENPH leads in 1 of 6 categories
ATXG leads 1 • TYGO leads 1 • WKSP leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 377.7x ATXG's $4M. ENPH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, WKSP holds the edge at +113.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $4M | $299M | $110M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | -$947,630 | -$1M | -$2M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$7M | -$4M | $3M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$1M | $0 | $726,000 | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +14.7% | +22.8% | +43.7% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -127.4% | -49.4% | -1.4% | -2.7% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -134.2% | -2.0% | -1.3% | +3.1% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -91.7% | -34.3% | -2.3% | +0.7% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | -7.9% | +15.3% | +33.7% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.5% | -136.8% | +75.8% | +81.8% | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ATXG leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $3M | $25M | $330M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $25M | $31M | $325M | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.18x | -0.38x | -3.48x | -145.00x | 27.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 100.47x | 18.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 22.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 0.67x | 0.15x | 3.19x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 0.09x | 0.43x | 10.24x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.56x | — | 34.19x | 48.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TYGO and ENPH each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TYGO delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-96 for WKSP. TYGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENPH's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TYGO scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -96.0% | -31.7% | -6.1% | +16.4% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.5% | -19.4% | -3.2% | +3.9% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | -2.9% | -7.9% | -11.0% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.8% | -3.9% | -9.8% | -9.5% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 1.03x | 0.59x | 0.10x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $735,905 | $22M | $6M | -$5M | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $324,953 | $28M | $8M | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $22M | $34M | $3M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.00x | -3.67x | — | 1.37x | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TYGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TYGO five years ago would be worth $4,421 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, TYGO leads with a +383.3% total return vs WKSP's -61.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.0% | -13.9% | -10.3% | +188.1% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.2% | -53.4% | -5.4% | +383.3% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -95.9% | +0.5% | -58.2% | -78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -99.6% | -69.3% | -55.8% | -71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -99.9% | -78.5% | -55.8% | +1737.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.8% | -65.4% | +0.2% | -25.2% | -39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and TYGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WKSP's 2.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TYGO currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.76x | 1.48x | 0.19x | 1.51x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.90 | $27.90 | $1.88 | $5.33 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.83 | $0.37 | $0.80 | $0.81 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +17.5% | +48.2% | +81.7% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 44.6 | 49.8 | 50.9 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281K | 157K | 15K | 547K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TYGO as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for TYGO (target: $7) vs 19.6% for ENPH (target: $42). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $6.70 | $42.41 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 3 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
ENPH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ATXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WKSP vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TYGO vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Worksport Ltd.
(WKSP) is the stronger pick with 454. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH?
On forward P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 18. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, Tigo Energy, Inc.
(TYGO) delivered a total return of -55. 8%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Worksport Ltd. 's 2. 76β — meaning WKSP is approximately 1318% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 114% for Enphase Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Worksport Ltd.
(WKSP) is pulling ahead at 454. 7% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tigo Energy, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to -289. 3% for Worksport Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WKSP leads at 203. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -190. 5% for Worksport Ltd. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -182. 3% for WKSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 100. 5x for Tigo Energy, Inc. — 82. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TYGO: 54. 0% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. WKSP, ATXG, TYGO, ENPH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WKSP or ATXG or CLPS or TYGO or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 14. 6% yield). Worksport Ltd. (WKSP) carries a higher beta of 2. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, WKSP: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WKSP and ATXG and CLPS and TYGO and ENPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (WKSP (Consumer Cyclical) and ATXG (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and TYGO (Energy) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WKSP is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TYGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while WKSP, ATXG, TYGO, ENPH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.