Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Specialty Retail
WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $6M | $7.33B | $220M | $14.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $13.92B | $771M | $24.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $517M | $2M | $60M |
| Gross Margin | 16.5% | 37.7% | 19.2% | 36.2% |
| Operating Margin | -127.4% | 7.3% | 6.1% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.7x | 15.5x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $5.06B | $201M | $8.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $319M | $9M | $477M |
WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worksport Ltd. (WKSP) | 100 | 5.6 | -94.4% |
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 100 | 125.5 | +25.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WKSP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 454.7% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1%
LKQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 77.1%, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 0.90, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.67x
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.6x)
- 3.7% margin vs WKSP's -134.2%
MPAA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- +24.3% vs WKSP's -61.2%
GPC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.8%
- 43.1% 10Y total return vs LKQ's 3.7%
- Beta 0.74 vs WKSP's 2.84
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 454.7% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs WKSP's -134.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs WKSP's 2.84 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GPC's 3.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs WKSP's -61.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs WKSP's -70.5%, ROIC 7.2% vs -59.2% |
WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPAA leads in 2 of 6 categories
LKQ leads 1 • GPC leads 1 • WKSP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.7B annually — 1992.6x WKSP's $12M. LKQ is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WKSP's -134.2%. On growth, WKSP holds the edge at +113.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $13.9B | $771M | $24.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $1.4B | $49M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $517M | $2M | $60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $808M | $30M | $548M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +37.7% | +19.2% | +36.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -127.4% | +7.3% | +6.1% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -134.2% | +3.7% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -91.7% | +5.8% | +3.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +0.2% | -9.9% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.5% | -52.3% | -18.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, LKQ trades at a 95% valuation discount to GPC's 223.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LKQ's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPC's 12.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $7.3B | $220M | $14.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $12.1B | $412M | $22.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.18x | 12.22x | -11.59x | 223.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.73x | 15.55x | 13.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.08x | 8.19x | 12.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 0.53x | 0.29x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 1.12x | 0.88x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.65x | 5.39x | 34.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WKSP and LKQ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-96 for WKSP. WKSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPC's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs GPC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -96.0% | +7.9% | +0.8% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.5% | +3.3% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | +7.2% | +6.2% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.8% | +9.0% | +6.6% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.77x | 0.78x | 1.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $735,905 | $4.7B | $192M | $7.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $319M | $9M | $477M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $5.1B | $201M | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.00x | 4.50x | 0.94x | 1.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPAA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPC five years ago would be worth $9,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for WKSP. Over the past 12 months, MPAA leads with a +24.3% total return vs WKSP's -61.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 34.5% vs WKSP's -62.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.0% | -3.4% | -7.2% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.2% | -24.1% | +24.3% | -5.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -43.6% | +143.5% | -32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -32.1% | -51.7% | -6.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +3.7% | -62.7% | +43.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.8% | -17.4% | +34.5% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WKSP's 2.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPC currently trades 69.4% from its 52-week high vs WKSP's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.76x | 0.90x | 0.93x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.90 | $42.67 | $18.12 | $151.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.83 | $27.23 | $9.09 | $96.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +67.3% | +63.3% | +69.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 41.2 | 58.0 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281K | 2.5M | 87K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKQ and GPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKQ as "Buy", MPAA as "Buy", GPC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 27.1% for LKQ (target: $37). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.22% vs GPC's 3.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.50 | $20.00 | $141.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 7 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.2% | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.21 | — | $4.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +2.2% | 0.0% |
MPAA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). LKQ leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WKSP vs LKQ vs MPAA vs GPC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Worksport Ltd.
(WKSP) is the stronger pick with 454. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LKQ Corporation (LKQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC?
On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Genuine Parts Company at 223. 9x. On forward P/E, LKQ Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC?
Over the past 5 years, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) delivered a total return of -6.
9%, compared to -98. 3% for Worksport Ltd. (WKSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPC returned +42. 6% versus WKSP's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Worksport Ltd. 's 2. 76β — meaning WKSP is approximately 288% more volatile than GPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Worksport Ltd. (WKSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 186% for Genuine Parts Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Worksport Ltd.
(WKSP) is pulling ahead at 454. 7% versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -289. 3% for Worksport Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WKSP leads at 203. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC?
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
4% net margin versus -190. 5% for Worksport Ltd. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKQ leads at 7. 8% versus -182. 3% for WKSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LKQ leads at 38. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) trades at 9.
7x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 74. 4% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC?
In this comparison, LKQ (4.
2% yield), GPC (3. 8% yield) pay a dividend. WKSP, MPAA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WKSP or LKQ or MPAA or GPC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 3. 8% yield). Worksport Ltd. (WKSP) carries a higher beta of 2. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPC: +42. 6%, WKSP: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WKSP and LKQ and MPAA and GPC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WKSP is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. LKQ, GPC pay a dividend while WKSP, MPAA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.