Chemicals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Chemicals - Specialty
WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $818M | $57.12B | $8.05B | $812M | $12.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.23B | $12.54B | $1.62B | $4.62B | $10.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $195M | $4.71B | $353M | $60M | $-1.64B |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 60.0% | 75.0% | 8.5% | 1.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.1% | 44.9% | 62.2% | 2.6% | -15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 12.7x | 13.3x | 49.5x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $400M | $26.16B | $3.77B | $908M | $6.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $2.14B | $2M | $3M | $2.72B |
WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westlake Chemical P… (WLKP) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 198.8 | +98.8% |
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 141.1 | +41.1% |
| Westlake Corporation (WLK) | 100 | 204.2 | +104.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WLKP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, Low D/E 49.8%, current ratio 2.80x
- PEG 0.35 vs HESM's 0.79
- Beta 0.26, yield 8.1%, current ratio 2.80x
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 26.1x)
MPLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 184.4% 10Y total return vs HESM's 121.2%
- 37.5% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
HESM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 8.7% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6%
CAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- Beta 0.06 vs WLK's 1.06
- 9.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WLK's 2.2%
WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +27.6% vs CAPL's +2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs WLK's -14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs WLK's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 9.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WLK's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.6% vs CAPL's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 20.6% vs -9.0% |
WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WLKP leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPLX leads 1 • HESM leads 0 • CAPL leads 0 • WLK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MPLX and HESM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 10.2x WLKP's $1.2B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, WLKP holds the edge at +28.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $12.5B | $1.6B | $4.6B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $466M | $7.0B | $1.2B | $200M | -$462M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $195M | $4.7B | $353M | $60M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $276M | $5.0B | $585M | $75M | -$508M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +60.0% | +75.0% | +8.5% | +1.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +44.9% | +62.2% | +2.6% | -15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +37.5% | +21.8% | +1.3% | -14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +39.8% | +36.1% | +1.6% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +5.2% | +2.3% | -100.0% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.7% | -17.3% | +5.9% | +2.4% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WLKP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, WLKP trades at a 86% valuation discount to CAPL's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WLKP offers better value at 0.08x vs HESM's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $818M | $57.1B | $8.0B | $812M | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $81.1B | $11.8B | $1.7B | $16.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.74x | 11.67x | 13.50x | 19.54x | -8.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.34x | 12.71x | 13.29x | 49.53x | 26.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | — | 0.80x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.62x | 13.27x | 9.67x | 5.80x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 4.83x | 4.96x | 0.22x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 3.95x | 10.85x | — | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.05x | 13.93x | 11.05x | 14.57x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WLKP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HESM delivers a 74.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WLK. WLKP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPLX scores 6/9 vs WLK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.1% | +32.8% | +74.9% | — | -16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.4% | +11.3% | +8.1% | +6.0% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.6% | +9.9% | +18.6% | +18.1% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.2% | +12.9% | +24.8% | +23.4% | -8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 1.80x | 8.61x | — | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $355M | $24.0B | $3.8B | $905M | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $2.1B | $2M | $3M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $400M | $26.2B | $3.8B | $908M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.26x | 5.85x | 4.54x | 1.86x | -24.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPLX five years ago would be worth $25,723 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,229 for WLK. Over the past 12 months, WLK leads with a +27.6% total return vs CAPL's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPLX at 25.1% vs WLK's -4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.9% | +6.4% | +13.6% | +8.4% | +32.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | +22.5% | +10.9% | +2.7% | +27.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.7% | +95.7% | +62.9% | +34.7% | -12.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.4% | +157.2% | +123.1% | +56.1% | +2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.3% | +184.4% | +121.2% | +87.5% | +142.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +25.1% | +17.7% | +10.4% | -4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WLKP and CAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLK's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLKP currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs WLK's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 0.18x | 0.27x | 0.06x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.60 | $59.98 | $44.14 | $23.62 | $124.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.75 | $47.80 | $31.63 | $19.61 | $56.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +93.8% | +87.5% | +90.2% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 46.5 | 49.1 | 41.3 | 32.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 1.8M | 1.6M | 50K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAPL and WLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WLKP as "Hold", MPLX as "Buy", HESM as "Hold", CAPL as "Hold", WLK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.0% upside for WLKP (target: $29) vs -17.1% for HESM (target: $32). For income investors, CAPL offers the higher dividend yield at 9.86% vs WLK's 2.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $60.25 | $32.00 | — | $101.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 28 | 9 | 15 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.1% | +7.0% | +7.4% | +9.9% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.89 | $3.94 | $2.84 | $2.10 | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +5.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
WLKP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MPLX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
WLKP vs MPLX vs HESM vs CAPL vs WLK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MPLX Lp (MPLX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK?
On trailing P/E, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus CrossAmerica Partners LP at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Westlake Chemical Partners LP is actually cheaper at 12. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westlake Chemical Partners LP wins at 0. 35x versus Hess Midstream LP's 0. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK?
Over the past 5 years, MPLX Lp (MPLX) delivered a total return of +157.
2%, compared to +2. 3% for Westlake Corporation (WLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPLX returned +184. 4% versus CAPL's +87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Westlake Corporation's 1. 06β — meaning WLK is approximately 1809% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westlake Chemical Partners LP grew EPS 378. 5% year-over-year, compared to -352. 8% for Westlake Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HESM leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus -13. 5% for Westlake Corporation — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HESM leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Hess Midstream LP's 0. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 37. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLKP: 25. 0% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) offers the highest yield at 9. 9%, versus 2. 2% for Westlake Corporation (WLK).
09Is WLKP or MPLX or HESM or CAPL or WLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, WLK: +142. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WLKP and MPLX and HESM and CAPL and WLK?
These companies operate in different sectors (WLKP (Basic Materials) and MPLX (Energy) and HESM (Energy) and CAPL (Energy) and WLK (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WLKP is a small-cap deep-value stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.