Publishing
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WLYB vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
WLYB vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Publishing | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2.30B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $154M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $899M | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $9.03B |
WLYB vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Wiley & Sons, … (WLYB) | 100 | 104.5 | +4.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 229.0 | +129.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLYB vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WLYB is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 24.8x)
- 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -1.6% vs NFLX's -23.6%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs WLYB's 10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WLYB's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WLYB's 9.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (54.3% vs 119.5%) | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.6% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WLYB's 6.0%, ROIC 29.8% vs 10.7% |
WLYB vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WLYB vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 27.0x WLYB's $1.7B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLYB's 9.2%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $402M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $154M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $190M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WLYB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.4x trailing earnings, WLYB trades at a 22% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WLYB's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.36x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.97x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.41x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.05x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.16x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $21 for WLYB. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WLYB's 1.20x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.8% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $813M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $899M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.16x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,995 for WLYB. Over the past 12 months, WLYB leads with a -1.6% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs WLYB's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.4% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.6% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WLYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WLYB is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLYB currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.08x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.41 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.16 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 666 | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WLYB as "Hold" and NFLX as "Buy". WLYB is the only dividend payer here at 3.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.39 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WLYB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
WLYB vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLYB or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB) offers the better valuation at 27. 4x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WLYB or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(WLYB) is the cheapest at 27. 4x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WLYB or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -20. 1% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus WLYB's +10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WLYB or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(WLYB) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 39β — meaning NFLX is approximately -559% more volatile than WLYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 120% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WLYB or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -10. 4% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. grew EPS 141. 9% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WLYB or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 5. 0% for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 13. 2% for WLYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLYB leads at 74. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WLYB or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(WLYB) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WLYB or NFLX?
In this comparison, WLYB (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WLYB or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(WLYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLYB: +10. 2%, NFLX: +875. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WLYB and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WLYB is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. WLYB pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.