Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
Grocery Stores
WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $1.75B | $42.03B | $1.04T | $648M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.01B | $147.64B | $703.06B | $2.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $1.02B | $22.91B | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 22.3% | 24.9% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 1.3% | 4.1% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 12.7x | 44.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $172M | $24.68B | $67.09B | $341M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $3.33B | $10.73B | $111M |
WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Village Super Marke… (VLGEA) | 100 | 183.6 | +83.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 0.06, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.93x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 44.7x)
- Beta 0.06 vs WMT's 0.12, lower leverage
KR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs VLGEA's 111.9%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 3.3% margin vs KR's 0.7%
VLGEA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 2.1%
- PEG 0.66 vs WMT's 4.06
- 2.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs WMT's 0.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs WMK's -18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.0% |
WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VLGEA leads in 2 of 6 categories
WMT leads 2 • WMK leads 0 • KR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLGEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 294.6x VLGEA's $2.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (WMT) to 0.7% (KR). On growth, VLGEA holds the edge at +6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $147.6B | $703.1B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $5.5B | $42.8B | $108M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $1.0B | $22.9B | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $3.5B | $15.3B | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +22.3% | +24.9% | +28.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +1.3% | +4.1% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +0.7% | +3.3% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +2.4% | +2.2% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +1.2% | +5.8% | +6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | +50.0% | +35.1% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VLGEA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, VLGEA trades at a 76% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VLGEA offers better value at 0.66x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $42.0B | $1.04T | $648M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $63.4B | $1.09T | $878M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.37x | 43.12x | 47.69x | 11.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.93x | 12.68x | 44.71x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.33x | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.94x | 10.91x | 24.85x | 8.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.28x | 1.46x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 7.33x | 10.45x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 362.58x | 12.55x | 24.97x | 18.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $7 for WMK. WMK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +13.0% | +22.3% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +5.0% | +14.7% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +5.5% | +17.5% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 4.16x | 0.67x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $55M | $21.3B | $56.4B | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $3.3B | $10.7B | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $172M | $24.7B | $67.1B | $341M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.59x | 11.85x | 15.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,411 for WMK. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs WMK's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs WMK's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +6.0% | +15.7% | +27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.3% | -6.4% | +32.7% | +22.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +42.7% | +160.5% | +122.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +90.7% | +186.9% | +93.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | +108.7% | +499.5% | +111.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +12.6% | +37.6% | +30.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and VLGEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VLGEA currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs WMK's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | -0.64x | 0.12x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.23 | $76.58 | $134.69 | $45.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.13 | $58.60 | $91.89 | $30.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +86.7% | +96.7% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 39.2 | 55.9 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 5.6M | 17.2M | 49K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and VLGEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KR as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.6% upside for KR (target: $75) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, VLGEA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $74.75 | $137.04 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 64 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.0% | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 21 | 37 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $1.35 | $0.94 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | +6.4% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
VLGEA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
WMK vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA?
On trailing P/E, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Weis Markets, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +44. 1% for Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus WMK's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately -118% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VLGEA leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weis Markets, Inc.
(WMK) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 35. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KR: 12. 6% to $74. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is WMK or KR or WMT or VLGEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, WMK: +76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMK and KR and WMT and VLGEA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WMK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; VLGEA is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.