Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WMS vs PNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
WMS vs PNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $12.64B | $12.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.99B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $471M | $671M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.5x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.45B | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $463M | $102M |
WMS vs PNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Drainage S… (WMS) | 100 | 335.4 | +235.4% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 204.3 | +104.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMS vs PNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs PNR's 127.0%
- +32.4% vs PNR's -11.5%
- 11.4% ROA vs PNR's 9.9%, ROIC 20.7% vs 12.1%
PNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 5.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 42.3%, current ratio 1.61x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% revenue growth vs WMS's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs WMS's 15.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs WMS's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WMS's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs PNR's -11.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs PNR's 9.9%, ROIC 20.7% vs 12.1% |
WMS vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMS vs PNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WMS and PNR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNR and WMS operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $3.0B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (PNR) to 15.7% (WMS).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $869M | $983M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $471M | $671M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $577M | $716M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.4% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 22% valuation discount to WMS's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PNR's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMS's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.6B | $12.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.6B | $14.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.82x | 20.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.47x | 14.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.20x | 14.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.11x | 3.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.30x | 17.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMS delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $18 for PNR. PNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMS's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs WMS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.2% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +9.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.7% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $982M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $463M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | 11.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMS five years ago would be worth $13,917 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,563 for PNR. Over the past 12 months, WMS leads with a +32.4% total return vs PNR's -11.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMS at 20.0% vs PNR's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | -23.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | -11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.0% | +41.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.2% | +25.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +567.5% | +127.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.0% | +12.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMS and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PNR is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMS's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMS currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $179.31 | $113.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $104.69 | $77.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 28.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 865K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
PNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WMS as "Hold" and PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.0% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 36.3% for WMS (target: $203). For income investors, PNR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs WMS's 0.43%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $202.67 | $113.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.7% |
PNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). WMS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
WMS vs PNR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMS or PNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pentair plc (PNR) is the stronger pick with 2.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMS or PNR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 20.
2x versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMS or PNR?
Over the past 5 years, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) delivered a total return of +39. 2%, compared to +25. 6% for Pentair plc (PNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMS returned +567. 5% versus PNR's +127. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMS or PNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pentair plc (PNR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
22β versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning WMS is approximately 8% more volatile than PNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pentair plc (PNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 88% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMS or PNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pentair plc (PNR) is pulling ahead at 2.
3% versus 1. 0% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pentair plc grew EPS 5. 9% year-over-year, compared to -10. 7% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMS leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMS or PNR?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 15. 5% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus 20. 5% for PNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNR leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMS or PNR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14.
9x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 42. 0% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMS or PNR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pentair plc (PNR) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 4% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS).
09Is WMS or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pentair plc (PNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
22), 1. 2% yield, +127. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNR: +127. 0%, WMS: +567. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMS and PNR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PNR pays a dividend while WMS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.