Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WMS vs SPIR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.64B
5Y Perf.+113.2%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$601.52B
5Y Perf.-76.8%

WMS vs SPIR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WMS logoWMS
SPIR logoSPIR
IndustryConstructionSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$12.64B$601.52B
Revenue (TTM)$2.99B$72M
Net Income (TTM)$471M$-25.02B
Gross Margin38.2%40.8%
Operating Margin22.8%-121.4%
Forward P/E24.5x11.4x
Total Debt$1.45B$8.76B
Cash & Equiv.$463M$24.81B

WMS vs SPIRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WMS
SPIR
StockNov 20May 26Return
Advanced Drainage S… (WMS)100213.2+113.2%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10023.2-76.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WMS vs SPIR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WMS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Spire Global, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

WMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 0.4%
  • Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth -10.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Play

SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (11.4x vs 24.5x)
  • +93.2% vs WMS's +32.4%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWMS logoWMS1.0% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueSPIR logoSPIRLower P/E (11.4x vs 24.5x)
Quality / MarginsWMS logoWMS15.7% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyWMS logoWMSBeta 1.32 vs SPIR's 2.93
DividendsWMS logoWMS0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SPIR logoSPIR+93.2% vs WMS's +32.4%
Efficiency (ROA)WMS logoWMS11.4% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 20.7% vs -0.1%

WMS vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WMSAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Pipe Segment
57.7%$1.6B
Allied Products And Other Business Segments
26.2%$707M
Infiltrator Water Technologies Segment
22.1%$596M
Intersegment Eliminations
-6.0%$-162,827,000
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

WMS vs SPIR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWMSLAGGINGSPIR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 41.8x SPIR's $72M. WMS is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, WMS holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.0B$72M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$869M-$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$471M-$25.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$577M-$16.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.2%+40.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.8%-121.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.7%-349.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.3%-227.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.4%-26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.4%+59.5%
WMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPIR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 56% valuation discount to WMS's 25.8x P/E.

MetricWMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$12.6B$601.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.6B$585.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS25.82x11.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.35x8406.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.11x5.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.30x
SPIR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

WMS delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMS's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMS scores 6/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.2%-88.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.4%-47.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.7%-0.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.5%-0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.88x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$982M-$16.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$463M$24.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.4B$8.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x9.20x
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMS five years ago would be worth $13,917 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +93.2% total return vs WMS's +32.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs WMS's 20.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.5%+134.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.4%+93.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.0%+238.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.2%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+567.5%-75.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.0%+50.1%
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WMS is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMS currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.32x2.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$179.31$23.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$104.69$6.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.9%+77.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.648.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded865K1.6M
WMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates WMS as "Hold" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.3% upside for WMS (target: $203) vs -5.7% for SPIR (target: $17). WMS is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$202.67$17.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts2212
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

WMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPIR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallAdvanced Drainage Systems, … (WMS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WMS vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WMS or SPIR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WMS or SPIR?

On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. at 25. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WMS or SPIR?

Over the past 5 years, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) delivered a total return of +39. 2%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMS returned +567. 5% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WMS or SPIR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 121% more volatile than WMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 88% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WMS or SPIR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -10. 7% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMS leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WMS or SPIR?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 15. 5% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WMS or SPIR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMS: 36.

3% to $202. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WMS or SPIR?

In this comparison, WMS (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WMS or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+567. 5% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMS: +567. 5%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WMS and SPIR?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

WMS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WMS and SPIR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WMS: 0.4% · SPIR: -26.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WMS: 25.8x · SPIR: 11.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.