Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WNC vs ELME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
WNC vs ELME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $304M | $187M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | 2.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | — |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $443M | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $1.33B |
WNC vs ELME — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 78.2 | -21.8% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNC vs ELME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -20.8%, EPS growth 179.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.85, current ratio 1.39x
- -20.8% revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
ELME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 34.4%
- -11.7% 10Y total return vs WNC's -24.9%
- Beta 0.44, yield 34.4%, current ratio 1.02x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -20.8% revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.5% margin vs WNC's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs WNC's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 34.4% yield, vs WNC's 4.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.1% vs WNC's -6.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.0% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 37.4% vs -15.3% |
WNC vs ELME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WNC vs ELME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WNC and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. On growth, WNC holds the edge at -20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.7% | -6.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ELME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $304M | $187M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $715M | -$625M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.47x | -1.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.88x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WNC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WNC delivers a -17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-17 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. WNC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ELME's 2.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.3% | -18.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.0% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.4% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | -10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $411M | -$812M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $443M | $520M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.97x | -3.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELME five years ago would be worth $8,573 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,093 for WNC. Over the past 12 months, ELME leads with a +7.1% total return vs WNC's -6.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELME at 4.2% vs WNC's -29.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | -4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.6% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.3% | +13.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | -14.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | -11.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.7% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WNC and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELME is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WNC currently trades 57.7% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 11.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.94 | $17.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $1.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +11.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ELME leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WNC as "Hold" and ELME as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 804.8% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs 13.8% for WNC (target: $9). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.44% vs WNC's 4.42%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +34.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.33 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.1% | 0.0% |
ELME leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). WNC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
WNC vs ELME: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNC or ELME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the stronger pick with -20.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wabash National Corporation (WNC) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WNC or ELME?
Over the past 5 years, Elme Communities (ELME) delivered a total return of -14.
3%, compared to -49. 1% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELME returned -11. 7% versus WNC's -24. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WNC or ELME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elme Communities (ELME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
44β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 85β — meaning WNC is approximately 318% more volatile than ELME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 2% for Elme Communities — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WNC or ELME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is pulling ahead at -20.
8% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1066. 7% for Elme Communities. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WNC or ELME?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Elme Communities — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WNC leads at 3. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WNC or ELME?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 34. 4%, versus 4. 4% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC).
07Is WNC or ELME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Elme Communities (ELME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
44), 34. 4% yield). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELME: -11. 7%, WNC: -24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WNC and ELME?
These companies operate in different sectors (WNC (Industrials) and ELME (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.