Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Rental & Leasing Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Communication Equipment
WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Rental & Leasing Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $317M | $90M | $1.71B | $225M | $72.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $51M | $763M | $103M | $11.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $-15M | $121M | $11M | $2.09B |
| Gross Margin | 2.0% | 43.2% | 53.9% | 91.4% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | -22.1% | 20.4% | 13.2% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | — | 16.3x | 16.4x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $443M | $21M | $2.71B | $7M | $9.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $8M | $16M | $25M | $1.17B |
WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| Willis Lease Financ… (WLFC) | 100 | 1069.6 | +969.6% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| Motorola Solutions,… (MSI) | 100 | 320.5 | +220.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 25.8x)
GNSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 69.8% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
WLFC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs MSI's 5.5%
- PEG 0.23 vs MSI's 1.39
- +68.2% vs SPOK's -26.7%
SPOK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSI's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 17.6% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
- Beta 0.21 vs WNC's 1.93
- 11.4% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 25.6% vs -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WNC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSI's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.2% vs SPOK's -26.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 25.6% vs -56.7% |
WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPOK leads 1 • WLFC leads 1 • GNSS leads 0 • MSI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GNSS and SPOK and MSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 233.3x GNSS's $51M. MSI is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $51M | $763M | $103M | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$9M | $273M | $17M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | -$15M | $121M | $11M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | -$3M | -$277M | $26M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +43.2% | +53.9% | +91.4% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -22.1% | +20.4% | +13.2% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -29.2% | +15.8% | +10.3% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -5.3% | -36.2% | +24.7% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | +145.9% | +23.2% | -100.0% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.7% | +78.0% | +57.9% | -64.0% | -13.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to MSI's 34.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WLFC offers better value at 0.21x vs MSI's 1.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $90M | $1.7B | $225M | $72.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $728M | $104M | $4.4B | $206M | $80.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.54x | -5.00x | 14.65x | 14.44x | 33.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.27x | 16.41x | 25.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.21x | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.92x | — | 13.38x | 8.91x | 23.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 2.22x | 2.54x | 1.61x | 6.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 41.58x | 2.18x | 1.56x | 30.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.91x | 28.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSI delivers a 89.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPOK scores 6/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.3% | -8.2% | +17.1% | +7.3% | +89.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.0% | -22.0% | +3.2% | +5.2% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.4% | -56.7% | +5.3% | +11.3% | +25.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | -68.2% | +6.2% | +12.1% | +25.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 9.85x | 3.74x | 0.05x | 4.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $411M | $13M | $2.7B | -$18M | $8.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $8M | $16M | $25M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $443M | $21M | $2.7B | $7M | $9.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.97x | -31.66x | 1.79x | — | 12.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WLFC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLFC five years ago would be worth $54,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, WLFC leads with a +68.2% total return vs SPOK's -26.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WLFC at 64.4% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.0% | -8.3% | +68.4% | -14.3% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | +2.6% | +68.2% | -26.7% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | -31.3% | +344.6% | +13.4% | +56.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.5% | -66.7% | +440.7% | +61.9% | +127.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | +14.9% | +879.9% | +13.3% | +554.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.8% | -11.8% | +64.4% | +4.3% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WLFC and MSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLFC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs SPOK's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 0.87x | 1.66x | 0.42x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.94 | $2.70 | $239.44 | $19.31 | $492.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $1.40 | $114.01 | $9.96 | $361.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +74.1% | +94.2% | +56.1% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 59.9 | 75.6 | 36.7 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 598K | 95K | 76K | 185K | 880K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SPOK and MSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WNC as "Hold", WLFC as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold", MSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs 11.0% for MSI (target: $481). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.95% vs WLFC's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | — | — | $15.00 | $481.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | — | 1 | 1 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | +0.4% | +11.9% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.33 | — | $0.81 | $1.29 | $4.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.6% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.3% | +1.6% |
WNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SPOK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
WNC vs GNSS vs WLFC vs SPOK vs MSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus Motorola Solutions, Inc. at 34. 0x. On forward P/E, Willis Lease Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Willis Lease Finance Corporation wins at 0. 23x versus Motorola Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI?
Over the past 5 years, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) delivered a total return of +440.
7%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLFC returned +879. 9% versus WNC's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 839% more volatile than MSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 3% for Willis Lease Finance Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLFC leads at 29. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI?
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 4% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLFC leads at 32. 3% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Motorola Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for Motorola Solutions, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), WNC (4. 2% yield), MSI (1. 0% yield), WLFC (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GNSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WNC or GNSS or WLFC or SPOK or MSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 1. 0% yield, +554. 6% 10Y return). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSI: +554. 6%, WNC: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WNC and GNSS and WLFC and SPOK and MSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (WNC (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and WLFC (Industrials) and SPOK (Healthcare) and MSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WLFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WNC, SPOK, MSI pay a dividend while GNSS, WLFC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.